Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the linear and angular differences in the nasolabial soft tissue in patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using two different three-dimensional imaging methods. Furthermore, the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of these methods were determined after comparing the data obtained from the imaging methods used in the study. Materials and methods: Preoperative (T0) and 6-months postoperative (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional facial scanning (3DFS) data from 22 patients who underwent maxillary advancement surgery were examined. The DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) data (CBCT group) and ".obj" format images (3DFS group) of the patients were analyzed using Dolphin software (Dolphin Imaging®, Version 12, Chatsworth, CA, USA). The linear and angular soft tissue measurements were calculated after determining the reference anatomical landmarks for both groups. Results: Measurements with CBCT and 3DFS imaging methods were compared at T0, T1, and all measurements (T0+T1). No statistically significant difference was observed between the CBCT and 3DFS groups for five measurements performed at T0 and T0+T1, but statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for the other seven measurements. There was no statistically significant difference between the CBCT and 3DFS groups for six measurements at T1, but there were statistically significant differences between the groups for the other six measurements. After reviewing the postoperative differences in the nasolabial soft tissue, a statistically significant increase in four linear and one angular measurement in the 3DFS group was observed, and there was a statistically significant increase in two linear and two angular measurements in the CBCT group. Upon comparison of postoperative differences in soft tissue alterations, no statistically significant difference between the 3DFS group and the CBCT group were observed in any of the soft tissue measurements. Conclusion: Orthognathic surgery has significant effects on nose width and upper lip morphology. Although both 3DFS and CBCT methods can be used to evaluate such effects, the results of the present study revealed differences in sensitivity and limitations between the two methods. Thus, surgical outcomes should be evaluated in consideration of the abovementioned parameters.

The difference uses of panoramic photo and cbct evaluation of the gnathoplasty surgery outcome

[Oral Panorama Reconstruction Method Based on Pre-Segmentation and Bezier Function].

The Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Methods in the Evaluation of the Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting.

The Comparison of Occlusal Radiograph and CBCT in the Evaluation of the Alveolar Bone Grafting

Comparison of Radiographical Characteristics and Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraosseous Jaw Lesions on Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT

Comparative analysis of 3D tomography based soft tissue rendering and Proface facial scanning systems in orthognathic surgery

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of modified alveolar cleft bone graft with cone-beam CT digital imaging in children

Assessment of parasymphysis and ramus fractures in pediatric patients using panoramic radiographs and CBCT: a case report

Comparison of Alveolar Bone Grafting Outcomes using CBCT in Individuals with UCLP Based on the Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment Methods

Changes of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestration after augmented corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment: a CBCT evaluation

Evaluation of Posterior Superior Alveolar Canal in Individuals With Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Comparison of temporomandibular joint osseous components in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients and normal controls: A CBCT study

Cone-beam Computed Tomography–synthesized Cephalometric Study of Operated Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Noncleft Children with Class III Skeletal Relationship

Comparative Analysis of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Root Proximity to the Mandibular Canal using Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography Imaging Modalities: A Pilot Study

Postoperative Radiologic Imaging in Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The coordination of bimaxillary alveolar arch widths in subjects with normal occlusion or posterior crossbite: A CBCT retrospective study

Comparison of prediction effect of inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance between cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography

An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects

The Precision of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Assessing the Structural Foundation of Teeth in Individuals with A One-Sided Cleft of The Lip and Palate Within the Iraqi Population

Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Radiographic Methods and Manual Programming of Articulators in Dentate Patients - A Clinico-radiographic Study

[Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Condylar Morphology Remodeling after Orthognathic Surgery in Mandibular Retrognathism by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography].