Abstract:Numerous studies have found that the Bayesian framework, which formulates the optimal integration of the knowledge of the world (i.e. prior) and current sensory evidence (i.e. likelihood), captures human behaviours sufficiently well. However, there are debates regarding whether humans use precise but cognitively demanding Bayesian computations for behaviours. Across two studies, we trained participants to estimate hidden locations of a target drawn from priors with different levels of uncertainty. In each trial, scattered dots provided noisy likelihood information about the target location. Participants showed that they learned the priors and combined prior and likelihood information to infer target locations in a Bayes fashion. We then introduced a transfer condition presenting a trained prior and a likelihood that has never been put together during training. How well participants integrate this novel likelihood with their learned prior is an indicator of whether participants perform Bayesian computations. In one study, participants experienced the newly introduced likelihood, which was paired with a different prior, during training. Participants changed likelihood weighting following expected directions although the degrees of change were significantly lower than Bayes-optimal predictions. In another group, the novel likelihoods were never used during training. We found people integrated a new likelihood within (interpolation) better than the one outside (extrapolation) the range of their previous learning experience and they were quantitatively Bayes-suboptimal in both. We replicated the findings of both studies in a validation dataset. Our results showed that Bayesian behaviours may not always be achieved by a full Bayesian computation. Future studies can apply our approach to different tasks to enhance the understanding of decision-making mechanisms. Bayesian decision theory has emerged as a unified approach for capturing a wide range of behaviours under uncertainty. However, behavioural evidence supporting that humans use explicit Bayesian computation is scarce. While it has been argued that knowledge generalization should be treated as hard evidence of the use of Bayesian strategies, results from previous work were inconclusive. Here, we develop a marker that effectively quantifies how well humans transfer learned priors to a new scenario. Our marker can be applied to various tasks and thus can provide a path forwarding the understanding of psychological and biological underpinnings of inferential behaviours.

Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications

Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP

The Bayes Factor and Its Implementation in JASP: A Practical Primer

Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution

There is Nothing Magical about Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction to Epistemic Probabilities in Data Analysis for Psychology Starters

An introduction to Bayesian statistics in health psychology

Bayesian data analysis.

Bayesian Tools of the Trade for Developmental Psychologists: A Quick-Start Guide Using JASP

Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP

Bayesian inference: More than Bayes's theorem

Bayesian Data Analysis: A Fresh Approach to Power Issues and Null Hypothesis Interpretation

A Review of Applications of the Bayes Factor in Psychological Research

Bayesian inference in processing experimental data: principles and basic applications

Why do we need to employ Bayesian statistics and how can we employ it in studies of moral education?: With practical guidelines to use JASP for educators and researchers

Bayesian Philosophy of Science

The Implementation of Bayesian ANOVA in JASP:A Practical Primer

Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.

Bayesian Analysis for Social Science Research

Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference

Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer

Bayesian statistics for clinical research