Abstract:Typical statistical practices in the biological sciences have been increasingly called into question due to difficulties in replication of an increasing number of studies, many of which are confounded by the relative difficulty of null significance hypothesis testing designs and interpretation of p-values. Bayesian inference, representing a fundamentally different approach to hypothesis testing, is receiving renewed interest as a potential alternative or complement to traditional null significance hypothesis testing due to its ease of interpretation and explicit declarations of prior assumptions. Bayesian models are more mathematically complex than equivalent frequentist approaches, which have historically limited applications to simplified analysis cases. However, the advent of probability distribution sampling tools with exponential increases in computational power now allows for quick and robust inference under any distribution of data. Here we present a practical tutorial on the use of Bayesian inference in the context of neuroscientific studies. We first start with an intuitive discussion of Bayes’ rule and inference followed by the formulation of Bayesian-based regression and ANOVA models using data from a variety of neuroscientific studies. We show how Bayesian inference leads to easily interpretable analysis of data while providing an open-source toolbox to facilitate the use of Bayesian tools.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that the statistical practices common in current biological research are difficult to replicate. In particular, many studies are affected by the relative difficulties in the design of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) and the interpretation of p - values. The paper points out that Bayesian inference, as a hypothesis - testing method fundamentally different from the traditional NHST, has received new attention because it is easy to interpret and clearly states prior assumptions, and is regarded as a potential alternative or complementary solution. The paper aims to solve these problems by providing a practical tutorial on how to use Bayesian inference in neuroscience research. Specifically, by discussing the Bayes' rule and its application in regression and analysis of variance (ANOVA) models, the paper shows how Bayesian inference can provide an intuitive analysis of data and provides an open - source toolbox to promote the use of Bayesian tools. In short, the paper mainly solves the following problems: 1. **Limitations of NHST**: The paper points out the difficulties in interpreting p - values and experimental design in NHST and how these difficulties affect the reproducibility of research. 2. **Advantages of Bayesian inference**: The paper emphasizes the advantages of Bayesian inference in interpretation, such as directly measuring the probability of the effect of observed data, and how to incorporate prior knowledge into the current inference process. 3. **Barriers to practical application**: The paper discusses that although Bayesian inference has many advantages, its application in neuroscience research is still limited, partly due to insufficient teaching and high requirements for mathematical ability. 4. **Providing solutions**: The paper helps neuroscientists overcome these barriers and better understand and apply the Bayesian inference method by providing detailed step - by - step guidelines and practical tools.

Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution