Adorno’s Essay on Wagner: Rescuing an Inverted Panegyric
Mark Berry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/OQ/KBU020
2014-09-01
Abstract:Theodor Adorno’s Versuch über Wagner stands after Nietzsche’s assorted polemics as perhaps the most sophisticated, provocative, and enduring critique of Wagner and his oeuvre, certainly fromwhat we might loosely term the political Left. Yet it remains much misunderstood, often taken, from Carl Dahlhaus’s initial review onward, for a far more unremittingly hostile attack than it was either intended as or actually became. Thomas Mann wrote that he had always believed Nietzsche’s Wagner critique to be an “inverted panegyric” (Panegyrikus mit umgekehrtem Vorzeichen), “another form of celebration.” Much the same, though not quite in the same way, might be said of Adorno’s book too, and not only because Nietzsche’s critique so often provides its starting points. It helps to understand Adorno’s Versuch within the German tradition, initiated at the latest by Nietzsche, of offering a “case of Wagner,” a case that must be addressed. That there is a “problem,” a “case,” few would deny. After all, one of Wagner’s greatest interpreters, Wilhelm Furtwängler, provided his “case of Wagner, freely after Nietzsche” as an essay, opening with the estimable claim that Wagner was “the most highly controversial figure in the entire history of the arts.” Adorno and Furtwängler had more in common than one might necessarily expect, though they were hardly kindred spirits; nevertheless, both in their different ways were attempting both an exploration of Wagner and his rescue (Rettung), to employ a term of which Adorno was fond. Adorno’s book was published by Suhrkamp in 1952, although it had for the most part been written between autumn 1937 and spring 1938 in London and New York, and four chapters had appeared previously in the 1939 Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. He later explained that he had “endeavoured to combine sociological, technical-musical, and aesthetic analyses in such a manner that, on the one hand, societal analyses of Wagner’s ‘social character’ and the function of his work would shed light upon its internal composition. On the other hand—and what seemed to me more essential—the internal-technical findings in turns should be brought to societal expression and be read as ciphers of societal conditions.” The
Philosophy