Behind the trigger: democracy, neoliberalism, and civilian militarism in Latin America
Saul M. Rodriguez School of Political Studies,University of Ottawa,Ottawa,ON,CanadaSaul M. Rodriguez is a part-time professor at the School of Political Studies at the University of Ottawa,where he earned his PhD in political science. He is the Editor-in-Chief and Founder of Magcondo Magazine and the author of two books and numerous other works on comparative politics,statecraft,security,democracy,authoritarianism and international relations in the Global South and Latin America. He was a Summer Fellow at the Jenny Craig Institute for the Study of War and Democracy (2023). He has been a professor at Javeriana University,Sergio Arboleda University,and the National University of Colombia. He holds an MA in research in social sciences from the University of Buenos Aires and a BA in history from the National University of Colombia,both of which he completed with the highest academic honours for his research work. His latest contributions include chapters published in the Routledge Companion to Global Cyber-Security Strategy and Counterterrorism and Civil Society (Manchester University Press).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2433698
2024-12-15
Third World Quarterly
Abstract:The relationship between liberalism and militarism continues to spark debate, especially regarding the impact of neoliberalism. While militarism is often seen as a threat to democracy, it can paradoxically enhance state capacity when strategically employed within radical political projects. This paper presents a comparative analysis of Argentina, Costa Rica, Venezuela and Colombia from 1982 to 2004, examining the interplay of political, military and economic networks of power. Using the concept of 'civilian militarism', this study reveals how neoliberal adjustments allowed the rise of civilian authorities that promoted militaristic values, using military actions and norms to pursue political goals in response to crises. It explores how neoliberal policies and transformations, sometimes compounded by contradictions surrounding the illegalisation of hard drugs, opened space for the emergence of radical political projects. This deterioration, coupled with weak political or civil society activism allowed militaristic leaders to rise with the intention of addressing the troubled times in some countries more than others. By offering a macro-historical comparative perspective, this paper demonstrates how neoliberalism, and the limitations of civilian and political actors, in some countries pave the way for the emergence of civilian militarism, which, if not contained, can lead to authoritarianism.
development studies