Cooptation, coercion and political authority: foreign assistance and control of the military in Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire and Upper Volta 1958-74

Riina Turtio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2019.1711144

2020-01-09

The International History Review

Abstract:At independence, African governments faced a challenge of building administrative and coercive capacities to extend their control over the state territory and the population. Colonial state institutions and the availability of military and economic assistance during the Cold War contributed to concentration of power and resources in newly-independent states. The limited reach of the state, however, made it more difficult for African governments to reinforce their authority, when the citizens benefitted little from the state. This paper focuses on factors that influenced the methods governments used in controlling the society and the military in postcolonial states. Controlling the armed forces became a pressing problem for African presidents when they saw many of their colleagues ousted by soldiers. Through a comparative approach, the article analyses why governments chose to rely on violence, cooptation or ideological influencing in reinforcing their authority. Guinea, Côte d'Ivoire and Upper Volta were all members of the same colonial unit but varied in their postcolonial economic policies and international alignments. The three countries, however, all ended up with problems of soldiers and coercion playing a significant role in accessing political power and economic resources. The article seeks to explain why.