Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Olfactory Sensitivity for Trigger Odorants in Parosmia and Phantosmia
Rumi Sekine,Anna Kristina Hernandez,Clara Overbeck,Marlise K. Hofer,Eri Mori,Antje Hähner,Thomas Hummel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31379
IF: 2.97
2024-04-06
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:This study aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with parosmia and phantosmia and whether individuals with parosmia exhibit increased sensitivity to odorants that have been previously reported as triggers, compared to those with quantitative olfactory dysfunction only. Parosmia and phantosmia patients have distinct characteristics and this may provide clinicians with a better understanding of possible olfactory outcomes in these patients. The higher olfactory sensitivity of all groups to trigger odors compared to PEA raises interesting points about parosmia triggers and odors in the context of warning for danger, in relation to the pathophysiology of parosmia that may be worth exploring in future studies. Objectives This study aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with qualitative olfactory dysfunction (qualOD) and whether individuals with parosmia exhibit increased olfactory sensitivity to previously reported odorous triggers of parosmia. Methods This study included individuals aged ≥18 years, divided into quantitative OD only, parosmia, and phantosmia groups. Data collected included: clinical‐demographic data, "Sniffin' Sticks" scores, questionnaires (depression scale, importance of olfaction), and information about parosmia and phantosmia. A proportion of patients underwent trigger odor threshold testing for 2‐Furfurylthiol [FFT] found in coffee and 2,6‐nonadienal [Nonadienal] found in cucumber. Results Those with parosmia were typically younger women, with shorter OD duration due to post‐viral OD (PVOD), hyposmic/normosmic, and experienced parosmia more severely. Parosmia was 3.5 times more likely in PVOD. Those with phantosmia were older, with longer OD duration due to idiopathic OD, hyposmic/anosmic, and experienced phantosmia less severely. There were no significant differences between FFT and Nonadienal threshold scores in patients with parosmia, phantosmia, or only quantitative OD, but all groups had significantly increased olfactory sensitivity for trigger odors compared to phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA). Conclusion Parosmia and phantosmia patients have distinct characteristics. This may provide clinicians with a better understanding of possible olfactory outcomes in these patients. The higher olfactory sensitivity of all groups to trigger odors compared to PEA raises interesting points about parosmia triggers and odors in the context of warning for danger, in relation to the pathophysiology of parosmia that may be worth exploring in future studies. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 2024
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology