Abstract:This study aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with parosmia and phantosmia and whether individuals with parosmia exhibit increased sensitivity to odorants that have been previously reported as triggers, compared to those with quantitative olfactory dysfunction only. Parosmia and phantosmia patients have distinct characteristics and this may provide clinicians with a better understanding of possible olfactory outcomes in these patients. The higher olfactory sensitivity of all groups to trigger odors compared to PEA raises interesting points about parosmia triggers and odors in the context of warning for danger, in relation to the pathophysiology of parosmia that may be worth exploring in future studies. Objectives This study aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with qualitative olfactory dysfunction (qualOD) and whether individuals with parosmia exhibit increased olfactory sensitivity to previously reported odorous triggers of parosmia. Methods This study included individuals aged ≥18 years, divided into quantitative OD only, parosmia, and phantosmia groups. Data collected included: clinical‐demographic data, "Sniffin' Sticks" scores, questionnaires (depression scale, importance of olfaction), and information about parosmia and phantosmia. A proportion of patients underwent trigger odor threshold testing for 2‐Furfurylthiol [FFT] found in coffee and 2,6‐nonadienal [Nonadienal] found in cucumber. Results Those with parosmia were typically younger women, with shorter OD duration due to post‐viral OD (PVOD), hyposmic/normosmic, and experienced parosmia more severely. Parosmia was 3.5 times more likely in PVOD. Those with phantosmia were older, with longer OD duration due to idiopathic OD, hyposmic/anosmic, and experienced phantosmia less severely. There were no significant differences between FFT and Nonadienal threshold scores in patients with parosmia, phantosmia, or only quantitative OD, but all groups had significantly increased olfactory sensitivity for trigger odors compared to phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA). Conclusion Parosmia and phantosmia patients have distinct characteristics. This may provide clinicians with a better understanding of possible olfactory outcomes in these patients. The higher olfactory sensitivity of all groups to trigger odors compared to PEA raises interesting points about parosmia triggers and odors in the context of warning for danger, in relation to the pathophysiology of parosmia that may be worth exploring in future studies. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 2024

Variation in odor thresholds for l-carvone and cineole and correlations with suprathreshold intensity ratings

Determining odour detection thresholds: Incorporating a method-independent definition into the implementation of ASTM E679

Individual differences in sensory threshold for aroma chemicals added to beer

Odor Thresholds by Forced-Choice Dynamic Triangle Olfactometry: Reproducibility and Methods of Calculation

Can humans smell tastants?

Association Between Orthonasal Olfaction and Chemosensory Perception in Patients With Smell Loss

Two Rapid Odor Threshold Methods Compared to a Modified Method of Constant Stimuli

Odor Discrimination by Mitral Cells in Rat Olfactory Bulb Using Microwire Array Recording

Odour and flavour thresholds for key aroma components in an orange juice matrix: esters and miscellaneous compounds

Determining Ultra-Low Organic Molecular Odor Thresholds in Air Helps Identify the Most Potent Fungal Aroma Compound

The use of carvone in consecutive patch testing

From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals

Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods

Odor sensory tests vs. In-silico prediction for the high-definition quantification of olfaction dynamics

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, l-carvone, CAS Registry Number 6485-40-1

Sensory characterisation of food and beverage stimuli containing β-ionone and differences between individuals by genotype for rs6591536

Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study

Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Olfactory Sensitivity for Trigger Odorants in Parosmia and Phantosmia

Exploring the physiological response differences of β-caryophyllene, linalool and citral inhalation and their anxiolytic potential

Sensory evaluation of the synergism among ester odorants in light aroma-type liquor by odor threshold, aroma intensity and flash GC electronic nose

Gender-Related Differences in the Correlation between Odor Threshold, Discrimination, Identification, and Cognitive Reserve Index in Healthy Subjects