Abstract:Abstract Background and objective: Adjuvant chemotherapy is a critical part of systematic treatment of primary breast cancer. Chemotherapy induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common adverse event during adjuvant chemotherapy as well as a major factor limiting the implementation of the planned schedule of chemotherapy, causing the delay and drug reduction. Recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) effectively stimulates the proliferation of neutrophil progenitors, promotes differentiation of these cells into mature neutrophils, and promote the release of neutrophils from the marrow, thus reducing the probability of CIN and related complications. Dose-Dense (DD) chemotherapy has become a commonly recommended regimen for primary breast cancer because of improvement of disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). rhG-CSF should be administered prophylactically due to the high incidence of marrow suppression during dose-dense regimen. Little high-level clinical evidence to determine a unified rhG-CSF regimen. Single injection of long-acting pegfilgrastim and continuous multiple usage of short-acting filgrastim are two major ways to support dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on a single database, we retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of two different rhG-CSF in supporting the dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy (ddEC) in primary breast cancer, aiming to test the effectiveness of two different rhG-CSF as well as comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Methods: Data of patients who received dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy with support of rhG-CSF at Peking University Cancer Hospital Breast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center from Jul, 2015 to Jun, 2018 were retrospectively collected. All of these patients were planned to receive four cycles of ddEC (Epirubicin 100mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) with using one of the following rhG-CSF schedules in parallel: 1) filgrastim 200-300μg/d on day 4, 6, 8, 10; 2) pegfilgrastim 6mg on day 2. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated. Results: A total of 555 patients were enrolled and 2,176 cycles were completed in this study, 254 were treated with pegfilgrastim and 301 were treated with short-term filgrastim. 536 patients (96.6%, 95%CI: 95.1%-98.1%) completed all four cycles of treatment. Chemotherapy delay occurred in 42 patients (7.6%, 95%CI: 5.4%-9.8%) for 47 cycles (2.2%, 95%CI:11.6%-2.8%). 18 patients (3.2%, 95%CI:1.7% - 4.7%) had CIN-related chemotherapy delay. 532 patients achieved RDI≥85% (99.4%, 95%CI:98.7%-100%). FN occurred in 25 patients (4.5%, 95%CI:2.8% - 6.2%). In the subgroup of using pegfilgrastim, Chemotherapy delay occurred in 10 patients (3.9%, 95%CI:1.5%-6.3%), 243 patients achieved RDI≥85% (99.4%, 95%CI: 98.7%-100%), and FN occurred in 11 patients (4.3%, 95%CI: 1.8%-6.8%). In the subgroup of using short-term filgrastim, chemotherapy delay occurred in 15 patients (5.0%, 95%CI: 2.5%-7.5%), 289 patients achieved RDI≥85% (96%, 95CI: 93.8%-98.2%), and FN occurred in 14 patients (4.7%, 95%CI: 2.3%-7.1%). FN is more likely in patients using short-term filgrastim (6.3%vs2.8%, p=0.048), causing more chemotherapy delay (10.8%vs4.1%, p=0.003). Age, tumor size, status of axillary lymph nodes, pathological type and baseline of ANC were not correlated with non-febrile neutropenia in patients using short-term filgrastim. Conclusion: Two schedules of rhG-CSF are effective and safe in supporting four cycles of neoadjuvant ddEC. The effects of these two methods were similar in the completion rate of chemotherapy(RDI≥85%) and safety(incidence of FN). Citation Format: Jingyi Zhao, Yingjian He, Zhaoqing Fan, Jinfeng Li, Xinguang Wang, Yang Yang, Xue Chen, Tao Ouyang. Efficacy of two kinds of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to support neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-22.

Association Between Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Use and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Among Elderly Patients with Breast, Lung, or Prostate Cancer

Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following adjuvant chemotherapy with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for breast cancer

Association of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment with Risk of Brain Metastasis in Advanced Stage Breast Cancer

Trends in the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors for older patients with cancer, 2010 to 2019

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) patterns of use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy

White Blood Cell Kinetics in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer Receiving Mecapegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-Interventional Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Risk of secondary hematologic malignancies associated with breast cancer chemotherapy and G‐CSF support: A nationwide population‐based cohort

Associations of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor with Toxicities and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Granulocyte growth factors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Role of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in development of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy

Risk of Neutropenia-Related Hospitalization in Patients Who Received Colony-Stimulating Factors With Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Efficacy and Safety of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Prophylaxis of Neutropenia with Mecapegfilgrastim in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has the potential to attenuate the therapeutic efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Clinical efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim in small cell lung cancer as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia post chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis

High-doses Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Benefit Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF)

Real-world study of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with gastrointestinal tumors

[Effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on peripheral blood leukocytes and lymphocytes in patients with chemotherapy-induced leukopenia]

Abstract P3-11-22: Efficacy of Two Kinds of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors to Support Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer