Associations of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor with Toxicities and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Sha Ma,Ying Wang,Kunming Qi,Wenyi Lu,Yuekun Qi,Jiang Cao,Mingshan Niu,Depeng Li,Wei Sang,Zhiling Yan,Feng Zhu,Hai Cheng,Zhenyu Li,Mingfeng Zhao,Kailin Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.01.011
IF: 6.196
2023-01-01
Cytotherapy
Abstract:Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We present a retrospective study of 67 patients with R/R B-ALL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, 41 (61.2%) patients received G-CSF (G-CSF group), while 26 (38.8%) did not (non-G-CSF group). Patients had similar duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia between the two groups. The incidences of CRS and NEs were higher in G-CSF group, while no differences in severity were found. Further stratified analysis showed that the incidence and severity of CRS were not associated with G-CSF administration in patients with low bone marrow (BM) tumor burden. None of the patients with low BM tumor burden developed NEs. However, there was a significant increase in the incidence of CRS after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS in patients who used G-CSF was longer. There were no significant differences in response rates at 1 and 3 months after CAR T-cell infusion, as well as overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that G-CSF administration was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS in patients with low BM tumor burden, but the incidence of CRS was higher after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS was prolonged in G-CSF group. G-CSF administration was not associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?