Abstract:Over the past three decades, the U.S. judiciary has grown increasingly less receptive to claims by convicted felons as to the conditions of their confinement while in prison. Although courts have not articulated a return to the "hands off" policy of the 1950s, it is clear that it has become significantly more difficult for prisoners to prevail in constitutional correctional litigation. The passage and aggressive implementation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act has been a powerful disincentive to such litigation in many areas of prisoners' rights law. From the perspective of the prisoner, the legal landscape is more hopeful in matters that relate to mental health care and treatment. Here, in spite of a general trend toward more stringent applications of standards of proof and a reluctance to order sweeping, intrusive remedies, some courts have aggressively protected prisoners' rights to be free from "deliberate indifference" to serious medical needs, and to be free from excessive force on the part of prison officials. A mostly hidden undercurrent in some prisoners' rights litigation has been the effort on the part of some plaintiffs' lawyers to look to international human rights doctrines as a potential source of rights, an effort that has met with some modest success. It receives support by the inclination of other courts to turn to international human rights conventions-even in nations where such conventions have not been ratified-as a kind of "best practice" in the area. The recent publication and subsequent ratification (though not, as of yet, by the United States) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) may add new support to those using international human rights documents as a basis for litigating prisoners' rights claims. To the best of our knowledge, there has, as of yet, been no scholarly literature on the question of the implications of the CRPD on the state of prisoners' rights law in a U.S. domestic context. In this article, we raise this question, and offer some tentative conclusions.

Keeping rights at home: British conceptions of rights and compliance with the European Court of Human Rights

Analyzing the British Judicial System: Ensuring Rights of the Accused During Investigation

The power of human rights tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change

Between facts and norms: Testing compliance with Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases

Accommodating Legal Pluralism and “Pluralizing” the Constitution: The Example of the United Kingdom

ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence

Exporting the European Convention on Human Rights

The Changing Concepts of the Constitution

European case law on migrants’ social and mobility rights: The need for a comparative approach in assessing ‘human rights overreach’

Property Rights and Legitimate Expectations Under United States Constitutional Law and the European Convention on Human Rights: Some Comparative Remarks

SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality

A Channel Apart: Why the United Kingdom has Departed from the European Commission’s Recommendation on Class Actions

The Narrowing of the European Court of Human Rights? Legal Diplomacy, Situational Self-Restraint, and the New Vision for the Court

The Essence of the Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection: Finding the Way Through the Maze of the CJEU’s Constitutional Reasoning

Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms

Rights-protectors or rights-violators? Deconstructing teacher discrimination against LGBT students in England and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an advocacy tool

Legal Consciousness and Cultural Capital

The implementation of the CJEU’s Joined Cases Aranyosi and Caldararu by the UK and Irish Courts – A real impact on the protection of fundamental rights in surrender proceedings?

The legal construction of privacy and data protection