Investigations with bowl-in-piston (CI type) and flat-piston (SI type) geometries to study the engine characteristics of a CI engine retrofitted for SI operation with CNG fuel
Penmatsa Sandeep Varma,Mayank Mittal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118083
IF: 10.4
2024-01-21
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:Compressed natural gas (CNG) is considered as one of the most promising alternative fuels in the transportation and power generation sectors to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The high knock resistance and wide flammability limits of CNG fuel are suitable for SI engine operation. The conversion of old diesel engines (with mechanical fuel injection equipment) to CNG SI operation would benefit from various aspects. Firstly, the conversion would allow to increase the usage of low-carbon content natural gas and reduce the dependency on diesel fossil fuel, which concurrently also helps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Secondly, the significant emissions emanating from these old diesel engines, because of the low fuel injection pressure and fixed injection timing, could be mitigated by converting to CNG SI operation. In addition, the flexibility to maintain a high compression ratio and the large displacement volume available with these engines are best suitable for operating in SI mode with gaseous CNG fuel. To this end, the present study aims to retrofit a single-cylinder CI engine for SI operation with CNG fuel. For this purpose, two representative piston designs, namely Bowl-in-piston (commonly used in CI engines) and Flat-piston (commonly used in SI engines) are considered to investigate their influence on the engine characteristics of a CI engine retrofitted for SI operation. Full-geometry and full-cycle simulations were performed using CONVERGE CFD software to investigate the two piston geometry effects. The CFD model is validated comprehensively by comparing the CFD results with the measured in-cylinder pressure, exhaust emission species concentrations, and air and fuel flow rates. Results showed that for both the piston geometries, similar levels of turbulence existed at the spark timing. Further, the spatial distribution of turbulent kinetic energy was found favourable for the combustion process in both the piston geometries. However, in the flat-piston case, flow with high-velocity magnitudes directed toward the cylinder head side significantly affected the flame propagation and caused a decrease in flame surface area and rate of pressure rise. In the bowl-in-piston case, the co-occurrence of high turbulence levels and most of the charge in the central region helped improve the heat-release rate. Consequently, higher in-cylinder pressures were observed in the bowl-in-piston case compared to the flat-piston case. For the same fuel mass, the gross indicated power noted with bowl-in-piston geometry is 2.96 KW, whereas, with flat-piston geometry, it is only 2.75 KW for the given condition. Hence, a 2.58 % higher (on an absolute scale) gross indicated efficiency was observed for the bowl-in-piston case. Comparison of indicated specific emissions at the exhaust valve opening crank angle degree revealed that flat-piston geometry exhibited a 39.5 % reduction in NOx emissions, whereas CO and UHC emissions have increased by 11 % and 3.5 %, respectively, compared to the bowl-in-piston geometry. Also, from the NOx emissions modeling aspect, this study shows that NOx results predicted using detailed NOx chemistry model match well with the experimental data compared to the extended Zeldovich mechanism model (with equilibrium assumption for O and OH radicals).
energy & fuels,thermodynamics,mechanics