The Southeast Asian Connection in the First Eurasian World Economy 200 BC AD 500

Sing C. Chew
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68219-8_5
2017-11-18
Abstract:Over world history, Southeast Asia’s contribution to the global economy prior to the AD 1500s, and especially in the early millennia of the current era (first century AD), has been much neglected by historians. To recalibrate the interactions of Southeast Asia with other parts of the world economy beyond the historical studies/scholarship written to date that are mostly of Eurocentric, Sinocentric or Indocentric in nature, we need to locate these historical relations within a world history of an evolving world economy (economy of the world). From recent archaeological findings and historical literary accounts, a world system of trade goods was being exchanged through a series of land and sea trading routes between the Mediterranean and South Asia and eastwards to Southeast Asia and China. Global trade exchanges via land and sea and movement of peoples defined this system.This chapter has two objectives. First, it will map out a world system of trading connections that were in operation at least at the dawn (if not earlier) of the first century of the current era (i.e., first century AD) that extended across seven regions: Europe/Mediterranean, East Africa, Arabian Peninsula and the Gulf, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia and China/East Asia. Given this set of trade connections extending over seven regions of the world excluding the Americas that were not connected at this point in time; this economic linkage can be viewed as the ‘first Eurasian world economy’. Secondly, this exercise will highlight Southeast Asia’s participation in this world trading system, the importance of its trading goods as commodities for consumption in the first global economy, and that Southeast Asia was a socioeconomic and politically developed area with established polities and not a region of just peripheral trade entrepôts as some have deemed it as such.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?