Impact of Spacing of Practice on Learning Brand Name and Generic Drugs

James Terenyi,Heidi Anksorus,Adam M Persky,Adam M. Persky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6179
IF: 2.876
2018-02-01
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Abstract:Objective. To test the impact of schedules of retrieval practice on learning brand and generic name drug information in a self-paced course. Methods. Students completed weekly quizzes on brand and generic name conversions for 100 commonly prescribed drugs. Each student completed part of the drug list on a schedule of equal, expanding, or contracting spacing, one practice (massed) or study only in a partial block design. Results. On measures of long-term retention, the contracting spacing schedule led to superior retention (67%) compared to the massed practice (50%) and study-only condition (46%); contracting practice also was significantly higher than expanding practice (58%,) or equal practice (59%). Overall performance decreased by almost 50% (final exam 95%, long-term retention 55%) over a 6-week period. Conclusion. A contracting spacing schedule was the most effective schedule of practice, and all spacing schedules were superior to massed practice or study-only conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?