Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

Social media, political information cycle, and the evolution of news: The 2017 Chief Executive election in Hong Kong

The Political Cultures of Forwarding on Chinese Social Media: Lessons From Hong Kong Chief Executive Election

Political irony as self-censorship practice? Examining dissidents’ use of Weibo in the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive Election

Taking stock of social-political polarization in Asia: political communication, social media and digital governance

Competition, Politics, & Social Media

The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election on social media: Identity, policy, and affective virality

Audience Response to Political News in Hong Kong

News as geopolitics: China, CGTN and the 2020 US presidential election

Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections

Changing Public Opinion and Politics in the Social Media Era

One Social Movement, Two Social Media Sites: A Comparative Study of Public Discourses

Road to the White House: Analyzing the Relations Between Mainstream and Social Media During the U.S. Presidential Primaries

Intention to consume news via personal social media network and political trust among young people: The evidence from Hong Kong

The Pathway Toward Radical Political Participation Among Young People in Hong Kong: A Communication Mediation Approach

Identity Collapse? Realignment of Taiwanese Voters in the 2024 Presidential Elections on Social Media

Enacting cross-platform (buy/boy)cotts: Yellow Economic Circle and the new citizen-consumer politics in Hong Kong

Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion

Social media engagement against fear of restrictions and surveillance: The mediating role of privacy management

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Contingent Symbiosis: News Start-Ups and Local Cyberspace Administration in Contemporary China

Social Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media