Abstract:To outline the current status of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) in stone treatment and the changes in the mode of application after the COVID-19 pandemic along with critical factors affecting the clinical practice of this particular procedure. This study targeted national and international urology experts who could share and contribute their experiences and perspectives on SWL practices after COVID-19 era. Approximately 650 urology specialists were invited to participate in the survey based study via Google Forms. Participation was voluntary and 398 of the invited participants completed the survey, yielding an acceptable response rate of approximately 61.23%. This survey highlights significant findings that shed light on the changes in clinical SWL applications. Nearly half of SWL procedures are performed by technicians or nurses instead of experienced urologists, potentially affecting the proper application and outcomes of the procedure. SWL seemed to be applied on a guideline (GL) indications based manner by the majority of the participants. Fluoroscopy remains still as the most commonly used method for radiological assessment, underscoring the necessity to teach sonography applications to younger urologists. Key reasons for the limited clinical application of SWL include the absence of lithotripters in the departments, high lithotriptor costs and significantly lower reimbursement rates compared to PNL and fURS modalities. Finally, an increase in SWL utilization rates has been observed post-COVID-19, highlighting its certain advantages realized during this period. These findings provide important insights into the role of SWL in stone treatment and the main factors influencing its clinical application practices. Although the popularity of SWL in the management of urinary stones is being stated to decline particularly in the last two decades, data obtained in this survey emphasized well that it is still a viable option especially for stones smaller than 15 mm. Our findings highlight the enduring relevance of SWL in contemporary stone therapy protocols in the context of COVID-19, where outpatient, non-invasive procedures are preferred. In addition to the consideration of certain factors affecting the rate of its application in clinical practice, to achieve high success rates with minimal complications in SWL, strategic patient selection and adherence to procedure guidelines seem to be crucial.

How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

A Comparative Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Residual Calculi after Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the management of urinary stones: New concepts and techniques to improve outcomes

[Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis]

Technological innovations in shock wave lithotripsy

Actual clinical practice pattern in SWL after COVID-19 era: a critical evaluation from different aspects

New Frontiers of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Medicine in Urology from Bench to Clinical Studies

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones

Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter

Contemporary treatment trends for upper urinary tract stones in a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2019: will shock wave lithotripsy become extinct?

Evaluating the role of urine chemistry in shock wave lithotripsy outcomes

CLINICAL STUDY OF SHOCK WAVE LITHORTRIPSY AFTER FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC LITHORTRIPSY

Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Prospective Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal and Upper Ureteric Stone Treatment: Clinical Assessment and Results

Shockwave lithotripsy: instrumentation and status in China.

Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones

Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Laparoscopic Era

Effect of focal zone size on treatment outcomes and renal injury following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi: a prospective randomized study

Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis

Renal Complications Following Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy