Abstract:Over the last decade, urinary lithiasis' prevalence has dramatically increased due to diet and lifestyle changes, growing 10.6% and 7.1% in men and women respectively. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has lost relevance in current practice due to endoscopic device development and unpredictability of results. Instrument miniaturization is leading to an increase of the percutaneous approach of increasingly smaller stones, while most flexible ureteroscopes durability and digitalization has allowed urologists to address larger stones. So that, decision algorithm is now impossible to define, but what is clear is that ESWL has declined worldwide. Can it disappear as a urinary lithiasis treatment modality? If we don't improve appropriate candidate selection and optimize disintegration efficiency, guidelines are going to replace the more "boring" ESWL by popular and more attractive endoscopes. Shock wave technology has evolved in the last two decades, however lithotripsy fundamental principle has not changed. ESWL has passed the test of time and centers dedicated to stone treatment should have a lithotripter in order to offer an appropriate balance in different options for different clinical situations. New developments will be focused on improvements in location (in-line navigation systems; Vision track system) and automatic ultrasound location on a robotic arm; monitoring and stone fixation, implementation of different focal sizes with new acoustic lenses, multitask working stations that allow endourological approach, coupling control (avoiding microbubbles) and low cost devices for different applications. On the other hand, optimizing outcomes by: slower pulse rates, ramping strategies and patient selection with soft stones, short stone-skin distance, low BMI and favorable collecting system anatomy, allow us to achieve better outcomes in shock wave treatments. SWL still represents a unique non invasive method of stone disease treatment with no anesthesia and low complication rates; and a high proportion of stones could still be treated with shock waves and remains among patient's first options. This update objective has been to review the evolution, identify shock wave new developments and clarify their impact on our daily practice in urinary stones treatment.

CLINICAL STUDY OF SHOCK WAVE LITHORTRIPSY AFTER FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC LITHORTRIPSY

A Comparative Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Residual Calculi after Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Uric Acid Stones

Treatment of Cystine Calculus with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Treatment of 137 patients with renal infection stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Urinary Tract Calculi (a Report of 2 725 Cases)

Low-energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Children with Urinary Calculi

Treatment of renal staghorn calculi in infant with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

Prospective Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal and Upper Ureteric Stone Treatment: Clinical Assessment and Results

Analysis of 300 Cases of Upper Urinary Tract Calculi in Children Treated by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Effect of focal zone size on treatment outcomes and renal injury following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi: a prospective randomized study

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF COMBINATION OF FIBEROPTIC CHOLEDOCHOSCOPY WITH INTERNAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL STONES IN THE BILIARY DUCTS

Shockwave lithotripsy: instrumentation and status in China.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones of different locations in children: a study of 311 cases

Efficacy of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treating Patients with Double J Stent Extubation Difficulties Due to the Stone Scales Surface

[Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis]

[Clinical Experiences of Semi-Sitting Astride Position for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment of Urethral Calculi].

Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Comparison Study among Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Retrograde Ureterolithotripsy and Percutaneous Ureterolithotripsy

THE FIRST CHOICE OF TREATMENT FOR URINARY INFECTED RENAL STONES

Clinical Applications of Plasma Shock Wave Lithotripsy Technique via Choledochoscope

Clinical Study on Relinqing Granules for Management to Ureteral Calculi after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy