Reinforcing supranational bank regulation, supervision, support and resolution in Europe: introduction
David Howarth,Joachim Schild
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2018.1424519
2019-04-25
Journal of Economic Policy Reform
Abstract:A decade on since the outbreak of the worst international financial crisis since the late 1920s, the effective design of EU bank regulation, supervision support and resolution remains hotly contested, in both academic and policy-making circles. European Banking Union (BU), one of the most important developments in European integration since the Maastricht Treaty and the launch of Monetary Union, still ranks very high on the European Union's reform agenda (see Howarth and Schild 2018 Howarth, David, and Joachim Schild. 2018. "Special Edition on Reforming Banking Union: introduction". . 21 (3): 175–177. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2018.1430730[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Mayes 2018 Mayes, David. 2018. "Banking union and the problem of untried systems". . 21 (3): 178–189. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2017.1396901[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Some reform proposals, such as the creation of the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS), have been placed on the backburner given German government concerns regarding the state of bank balance sheets in some euro area member states—and, specifically, bank holdings of nonperforming loans—and that incentives for future risk-taking have not been sufficiently reduced (Howarth and Quaglia 2018 Howarth, David, and Lucia Quaglia. 2018. "The European Deposit Insurance Scheme: A Step too far in Banking Union". . 21 (3): 190–209. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2017.1402682[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Other reforms affecting all EU member states have met the determined opposition of a number of national governments and powerful bank interests, including the Commission's proposal for a regulation on Bank Structural Reform (BSR), which was dropped by the Commission in late 2017. However, there are also a range of other legislative and institutional reforms designed to reinforce EU bank regulation and supervision which have either been proposed and / or adopted. The main objectives of these reforms are to make banking safer—and specifically to diminish the systemic effects of losses resulting from high risk bank activities—and to reinforce the ability of supervisory authorities to monitor effectively bank activity.
economics,development studies