Abstract:[The crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) framework in the euro area requires a reset. Currently the framework is far more likely to manufacture a crisis rather than enable the authorities to manage one. Specifically, the current framework is far more likely to trigger the doom loop between weak banks and weak governments than to terminate or untie it. Nor will the current framework necessarily protect deposits. There is no guarantee that a euro in covered deposits will remain a euro, if the bank in which the deposit is held fails, and/or the Member State in which the failing bank is headquartered defaults.The CMDI framework aims to enhance financial stability, limit recourse to taxpayer money, promote competition and protect depositors. These policy objectives remain valid. What needs to change is the method that authorities use to achieve those objectives. First, the approach needs to integrate micro- and macro- aspects of crisis management. In particular, the approach needs to take account of the prospective roles of the European Stability Mechanism, both as a provider of credit to Member States as well as a guarantor of the Single Resolution Fund. Second, the approach needs encompass the central bank as a provider of liquidity to banks individually and to the market as a whole. Finally, the approach needs to recognize that by the time any reform proposed as a result of this review would become effective, the SRB and the significant institutions in the euro area will have completed the transition and become fully resolvable via bail-in. This affords the euro area the opportunity to reset expectations about resolution.The euro area should take this opportunity to make the crisis management and deposit insurance framework more European and more uniform. Specifically, there should be a single presumptive path for dealing with failed banks: the use of bail-in to facilitate the orderly liquidation under a solvent- wind down strategy. This will protect deposits and set the stage for the transformation of the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) into the Single Deposit Guarantee Scheme (SDGS) with a backstop from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). In addition, measures should be taken to avoid forbearance, including the transfer of responsibility for emergency liquidity assistance (ELA) from national central banks to the ECB to create a single lender of last resort. Finally, national deposit guarantee schemes should become investors of last resort in the gone-concern capital of the failing bank. This will ensure that the orderly liquidation approach extends to all banks, including those without access to capital markets. Together, these measures would complete Banking Union, promote market discipline, avoid imposing additional burdens on taxpayers, help untie the doom loop between weak banks and weak governments, strengthen the euro and enhance financial stability

The Macro‐Economic Effects of a European Deposit (Re‐)Insurance Scheme

The difficult construction of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme: a step too far in Banking Union?

Fear, Deposit Insurance Schemes, and Deposit Reallocation in the German Banking System

Deposit guarantee reform in Europe: does European deposit insurance scheme increase banking stability?

How Do Regulatory Ability and Bank Competition Affect the Adoption of Explicit Deposit Insurance Scheme and Banks’ Risk-Taking Behavior?

Reset Required: The Euro Area Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance Framework

Deposit insurance, bank exit, and spillover effects

Does Interbank Market Matter for Business Cycle Fluctuation? An Estimated DSGE Model with Financial Frictions for the Euro Area

How Does Deposit Insurance Affect Bank Risk? Evidence from the Recent Crisis

Macroprudential Policy in a Heterogeneous Environment-An Application of Agent-Based Approach in Systemic Risk Modelling

Dynamic Banking with Non-Maturing Deposits.

Capital Regulation with Non-Maturing Deposits

Capital Regulation, Deposit Insurance and Bank Risk: International Evidence from Normal and Crisis Periods

Macroprudential Policy Interactions in a Sectoral DSGE Model with Staggered Interest Rates

A basic macroeconomic agent-based model for analyzing monetary regime shifts

The Sovereign-Bank Diabolic Loop and ESBies

From financial instability to green finance: the role of banking and monetary policies in the Eurace model

How Safe are European Safe Bonds? An Analysis from the Perspective of Modern Portfolio Credit Risk Models

ESBies: safety in the tranches

A Pure Bureaucratic-Entrepreneurial Theory of Deposit Insurance Adoption

To bail-out or to bail-in? Answers from an agent-based model