Comparative analysis of Sanger and next generation sequencing methods for 16S rDNA analysis of post-mortem specimens

Yoonjung Cho,Min Ho Lee,Hyo Sook Kim,Moonhee Park,Min-Hee Kim,Hansol Kwon,Jong-Bae Kim,Yang Han Lee,Dong Sub Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1402957
2017-12-01
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Abstract:Forensic microbiology is widely applied to identify people at crime scenes and determine the cause and time of deaths by examination of trace evidence. In particular, identification of bacteria from post-mortem specimens is important because the cause of death could be an infection with clinically significant bacteria that results in a fatal outcome, such as sepsis. The MicroSEQ 500 16S rDNA Bacteria Identification system (MicroSeq ID) from Applied Biosystems is a molecular technique for profiling of bacteria isolated by cultures, based on Sanger sequencing of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene. The MiSeq Illumina platform uses next-generation sequencing (NGS) for metagenomic analysis of 16S rDNA and culture-independent identification of bacteria. In this study, we analysed 65 post-mortem specimens by both methods and compared the workflows involved with regard to methodology, time-efficiency, cost-efficiency, and performance to determine the limitations and benefits of these techniques for forensic application. We found that MiSeq is more time-efficient, and exhibits superior cost-efficiency when more than 30 samples are analysed. In addition, MiSeq has a number of other advantages over MicroSeq ID, including a simpler identification of bacteria that are difficult to culture and use of a larger library of 16S rDNA, allowing more precise identification of bacterial species.
medicine, legal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?