Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To establish the specific 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer regions pattern in different bacteria using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), DNA cloning and sequences analysis.METHODS:A pair of primers were selected from highly conserved sequences adjacent to the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region. Bacterial DNA of sixty-one strains of standard bacteria and corresponding clinical isolates representative of 20 genera and 27 species was amplified by PCR, and further studied by RFLP, DNA cloning and sequences analysis. Meanwhile, all specimens were examined by bacterial culturing and PCR-RFLP analysis.RESULTS:The 27 different standard strains showed one, two, three or more than three bands. The sensitivity of PCR reached 2.5 colony-forming unit (CFU), and there was no cross reaction to the human, fungal or viral genomic DNAs. Fifteen species could be distinguished immediately by PCR, while another 10 species were further identified by Hinf I or Alu I digestion. Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) and Enterococcus durans (Ed) could not be differentiated from each other by Alu I or Hinf I digestion. The spacer sequences of the Kp and Ed were 908 bp and 909 bp, respectively, and they differed only at the site of the 779th nucleotide. The former was G, and the latter was A. The 760 - 790 bp sequence of Kp was as follows: CGACTGCACCGCCTCCTAC / GGCCGCGTATTC. The 760 - 790 bp sequence of Ed was as follows: CGACTGCAC CGCCTCCTAC / AGCCGCGTATTC. Only one enzyme XmaIII, could discriminate the two. The cleaving site of XmaIII is C downward arrow GGCCG. Kp DNA was cleaved into 778 bp and 130 bp fragments, while E. durans was not. Of 42 specimens with suspected septicemia, 15 were positive (35.7%) on blood culture, and 27 on PCR (64.29%). The positive rate of PCR was significantly higher than that of blood culture (P < 0.01). Of the six CSF specimens, one was positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis (Se) on culture as well as by PCR, while two specimens which were negative on cultures were positive by PCR and were diagnosed as Se according to its DNA pattern. One specimen was culture-positive for Cryptococcus neoformans (Cn) but was negative by PCR. The other two specimens were negative by both PCR and culture. Fifteen blood samples from healthy children were negative by both blood culture and PCR.CONCLUSIONS:The method of detecting bacterial 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions using PCR-RFLP techniques was specific, sensitive, rapid and accurate in detecting pathogens in clinical bacterial infections.

Identification of bacterial pathogens from clinical samples using 16S rRNA sequencing

Study on the Bacterial Identification Using 16S-23S Rrna Gene Spacer Regions

16S—23S rRNA基因区间细菌鉴定实验研究

Use of 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of a Broad Range of Clinically Relevant Bacterial Pathogens

Detection of Bacterial DNA by PCR and Reverse Hybridization in the 16s Rrna Gene

Detection of Bacterial DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction and Reverse Hybr Idization of 16srrna Gene

Molecular Biological Study on 16S-23S Rrna Gene Interval of Common Infective Bacteria in Children

16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and infectious disease diagnosis

16S rDNA PCR-DGGE and sequencing in the diagnosis of neonatal late-onset septicemia

Rapid Diagnosis of Bacterial Sepsis with PCR Amplification and Microarray Hybridization in 16S rRNA Gene

Rapid Identification of Common Clinical Organism by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/ionization Time Of-Fright Mass Spectrometry

Establishment of Quantifying and Typing Analysis of 16S Rrna Gene by Real-Time PCR

[Molecular Diagnosis of the Specific DNA Patterns of 16S-23S Rrna Gene of Bacteria].

Comparison of an automated DNA extraction and 16S rDNA real time PCR/sequencing diagnostic method using optimized reagents with culture during a 15-month study using specimens from sterile body sites

Impact of 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis for Identification of Bacteria on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Sanger Sequencing Implementation in Clinically Ill Patients for Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens Identification

Direct 16S/18S rRNA Gene PCR Followed by Sanger Sequencing as a Clinical Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Bacterial and Fungal Infections: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sensitive Identification of Bacterial DNA in Clinical Specimens by Broad-Range 16S rRNA Gene Enrichment

Improved Targeting of the 16S Rdna Nanopore Sequencing Method Enables Rapid Pathogen Identification in Bacterial Pneumonia in Children.

16S ribosomal DNA sequence-based identification of bacteria in laboratory rodents: a practical approach in laboratory animal bacteriology diagnostics

The clinical utility of Nanopore 16S rRNA gene sequencing for direct bacterial identification in normally sterile body fluids