The Value of Regulators as Monitors: Evidence from Banking

Emilio Bisetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3081537

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:While conventional wisdom suggests that financial supervision is costly for bank shareholders,agency theory suggests that supervisors’ audits can reduce shareholder monitoring costs.I study this trade-off in the context of an unexpected decrease in off-site surveillance intensityby the US Federal Reserve. Banks subject to reduced surveillance experience a 1% loss in bankTobin’s q and a 7% loss in equity market-to-book. These banks engage in more earnings management, and appear to compensate lower regulatory surveillance with costly internal audits.My results document a novel substitution effect between public monitoring by regulators andprivate monitoring by shareholders.