Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

The impact of income inequality on rental affordability: An empirical study in large American metropolitan areas

Decomposition Analysis on Income Inequality in Urban China

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Housing Affordability and Housing Vacancy in China: the Role of Income Inequality

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

Explaining Inter-Metropolitan Variation in Housing Rents in China

Understanding after-housing disposable income effects on rising inequality

Income Inequality and Housing Prices in the Very Long-run

The Study of the Rural-urban Income Inequality a View from Residents' Income Resource

Income Inequality in Today’s China

A Study on Influence of Housing Price on Urban Residents Income Gap: an Empirical Analysis Based on Comparison Between Regional Market Differences

Housing Inequality in Urban China

Analysis on the Evolution and Major Effect Factor of Urban-Rural Income Inequality in Beijing

Persistent disparities in affordable rental housing among America's ethnoracial groups

Does income inequality affect direct and indirect household CO2 emissions? A quantile regression approach

Scaling of Urban Income Inequality in the United States

The dynamics of housing cost burden among renters in the United States

Rent price control – yet another great equalizer of economic inequalities? Evidence from a century of historical data

Housing Costs and Regional Income Inequality in China and the U.S

The Impact of Micro-Level Influencing Factors on Home Value: A Housing Price-Rent Comparison