Abstract:The development of solid-state batteries has gained significant attention in recent years, owing to their potential to enhance the temperature range and energy density of energy storage devices. Sulfide-based electrolytes are some of the most promising candidates for solid-state batteries, thanks to their high ionic conductivity and low processing temperature. For lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the transition from liquid to solid electrolytes holds even greater promise. Sulfur is a readily available cathode material known for its high specific capacity, which endows Li-S batteries with remarkable specific energy and favourable environmental and economic impact. In liquid electrolytes however, the solubility of sulfur and lithium polysulfide causes a multitude of issues that hamper the performance of the Li-S system: rapid self-discharge, redox shuttle mechanism during charging, and loss of active sulfur and lithium material due to direct chemical reactivity. Solid-state Li-S cells are not prone to these issues, but they have, of course, issues of their own. Amongst them, the stability of the interface between the electrolyte and the lithium is of crucial importance to allow the use of this very high energy density negative electrode. In the present study, we compare two sulfide electrolytes, Li 6 PS 5 Cl and Li 7 P 3 S 11 , and assess their respective stability against lithium. We used innovative methods to characterize the interphase between the sulfide and the lithium without damaging it upon dismantling the cell. The nature and the properties of this interphase was characterised via EIS, XPS and ToF-SIMS. The EIS study showed that Li 6 PS 5 Cl forms a much more stable interphase with lithium than Li 7 P 3 S 11 , which is in accordance with most recent results in the literature. The XPS study confirmed the chemical composition of the interphase. Li 2 S and Li 3 P were present for both electrolytes. In the case of Li 6 PS 5 Cl, LiCl was also identified as expected. Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) assisted abrasion of the interphase followed by in-situ XPS and ToF-SIMS suggested a separation of the components of the interphase depending on the depth of the abrasion. The interphase was found to be organised as Li 2 S-, Li 3 P- or LiCl-rich discrete layers, with the Li 2 S-rich layer being consistently the closest to lithium. This result confirms and completes the most recent research in the field published by Otto et al. in 2022 (doi: 10.1002/admi.202102387). To establish solid-state batteries as a practical energy storage option, it is essential to fully understand and effectively manage the Li-electrolyte interface. These findings suggest that thanks to the relative stability of its interface with lithium, Li 6 PS 5 Cl is the better option for solid-state lithium metal cells. It also sheds light on the reasons why this interface is more stable. The self-assembled lamellar structure of the interphase could also inspire strategies to better control the stability of solid electrolytes versus lithium.

Solid Electrolyte Layers by Solution Deposition

(Invited) Sulfide-Based Solid Electrolytes for Solid State Batteries

A Dynamically Stable Sulfide Electrolyte Architecture for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Binderless Sheet-Type Oxide-Sulfide Composite Solid Electrolyte for All-Solid-State Batteries

Sulfide Based Solid Electrolyte for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Multi-layered Electrolytes for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Fabrication of 60μm-Thick Free-Standing Bilayer Solid Electrolytes for Solid-State Batteries Using Solution Processing and Lamination

Sulfide Solid Electrolytes for Lithium Battery Applications

Development of Sulfide Solid Electrolytes and Interface Formation Processes for Bulk-Type All-Solid-State Li and Na Batteries

A High Ion Conductive Solid Electrolyte Film and Interface Stabilization Strategy for Solid-state Li-S Battery

Thin Free-Standing Sulfide/Halide Bilayer Electrolytes for Solid-State Batteries Using Slurry Processing and Lamination

Design Strategies, Practical Considerations, and New Solution Processes of Sulfide Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Batteries

All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Solid Electrolytes with Low-Temperature Processability

Forming Artificial Solid-Electrolyte-Interfaces between Lithium Metal Anodes and Halide and Sulfide Solid Electrolytes in All-Solid-State-Batteries Via Spatial-Atomic-Layer-Deposition

In situ modified sulfide solid electrolyte enabling stable lithium metal batteries

Stabilizing Li4SnS4 Electrolyte from Interface to Bulk Phase with a Gradient Lithium Iodide/Polymer Layer in Lithium Metal Batteries

Sulfide-Based Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An in-Depth Study of the Li-Electrolyte Interface

Enhanced Interphase Ion Transport via Charge‐Rich Space Charge Layers for Ultra‐Stable Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

In situ formed interfacial layer for all-solid-state lithium batteries with sulfide electrolyte films

Interfacial Chemistry and Ion-Transfer Mechanism for a Tailored Poly(thioether)-Enabled Hybrid Solid Polymer Electrolyte with Electrochemical Properties in All-Solid-state Lithium-Sulfur Batteries