Abstract:Background Multiparametric MRI can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥7) but is limited by reader experience and interobserver variability. In contrast, deep learning (DL) produces deterministic outputs. Purpose To develop a DL model to predict the presence of csPCa by using patient-level labels without information about tumor location and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods Data from patients without known csPCa who underwent MRI from January 2017 to December 2019 at one of multiple sites of a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. A convolutional neural network was trained to predict csPCa from T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. The reference standard was pathologic diagnosis. Radiologist performance was evaluated as follows: Radiology reports were used for the internal test set, and four radiologists' PI-RADS ratings were used for the external (ProstateX) test set. The performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the DeLong test. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAMs) were used to show tumor localization. Results Among 5735 examinations in 5215 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; all male), 1514 examinations (1454 patients) showed csPCa. In the internal test set (400 examinations), the AUC was 0.89 and 0.89 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .88). In the external test set (204 examinations), the AUC was 0.86 and 0.84 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .68). DL classifier plus radiologists had an AUC of 0.89 (P < .001). Grad-CAMs demonstrated activation over the csPCa lesion in 35 of 38 and 56 of 58 true-positive examinations in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusion The performance of a DL model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of csPCa at MRI, and Grad-CAMs localized the tumor. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Johnson and Chandarana in this issue.

Deep learning approaches for detection and removal of ghosting artifacts in MR spectroscopy

Deep Learning-Based Denoising for Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Signals.

Denoising single MR spectra by deep learning: Miracle or mirage?

Denoising neural networks for magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Human-Expert-Level Brain Tumor Detection Using Deep Learning with Data Distillation and Augmentation

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Denoising Using Few in Vivo Data

Deep learning corrects artifacts in RASER MRI profiles

Deep Learning-Based Denoising of CEST MR Data: A Feasibility Study on Applying Synthetic Phantoms in Medical Imaging

Deep Learning Approaches for Automatic Quality Assurance of Magnetic Resonance Images Using ACR Phantom

Machine Learning-Enabled High-Resolution Dynamic Deuterium MR Spectroscopic Imaging

Q-MRS: A Deep Learning Framework for Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Spectra Analysis

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quantification using Deep Learning

Deep Learning for Image Enhancement and Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging—State-of-the-Art and Challenges

Enhancing Deep Learning-Driven Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction via Self-Supervised Denoising

Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study

Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra

Eddeep: Fast eddy-current distortion correction for diffusion MRI with deep learning

Denoising Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Data Using Stacked Autoencoder for Improving Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speed of MRS

DeepGhostBusters: Using Mask R-CNN to Detect and Mask Ghosting and Scattered-Light Artifacts from Optical Survey Images

Fully Automated Deep Learning Model to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI