Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra

Sana Vaziri,Huawei Liu,Emily Xie,Hélène Ratiney,Michaël Sdika,Janine M. Lupo,Duan Xu,Yan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1219343

IF: 4.3

2023-08-29

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract:Purpose: While 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) provides valuable spatial metabolic information, one of the hurdles for clinical translation is its interpretation, with voxel-wise quality control (QC) as an essential and the most time-consuming step. This work evaluates the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models for automated QC filtering of individual spectra from 3D healthy control and patient datasets. Methods: A total of 53 3D MRSI datasets from prior studies (30 neurological diseases, 13 brain tumors, and 10 healthy controls) were included in the study. Three ML models were evaluated: a random forest classifier (RF), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and an inception CNN (ICNN) along with two hybrid models: CNN + RF, ICNN + RF. QC labels used for training were determined manually through consensus of two MRSI experts. Normalized and cropped real-valued spectra was used as input. A cross-validation approach was used to separate datasets into training/validation/testing sets of aggregated voxels. Results: All models achieved a minimum AUC of 0.964 and accuracy of 0.910. In datasets from neurological disease and controls, the CNN model produced the highest AUC (0.982), while the RF model achieved the highest AUC in patients with brain tumors (0.976). Within tumor lesions, which typically exhibit abnormal metabolism, the CNN AUC was 0.973 while that of the RF was 0.969. Data quality inference times were on the order of seconds for an entire 3D dataset, offering drastic time reduction compared to manual labeling. Conclusion: ML methods accurately and rapidly performed automated QC. Results in tumors highlights the applicability to a variety of metabolic conditions.

neurosciences