Abstract:Abstract Regulating interest groups’ access to decision makers constitutes a key dimension of legitimate and accountable systems of government. The European Union explicitly links lobbying regulation with the democratic credentials of its supranational system of governance and proposes transparency as a solution to increase legitimacy and regulate private actors’ participation in policy making. This lobbying regulation regime consists of a Transparency Register that conditions access to decision makers upon joining it and complying with its information disclosure requirements. The extent to which transparency‐based regulatory regimes are successful in ensuring effective regulation of targeted actors and in being recognised as a legitimate instrument of governance constitutes a key empirical question. Therefore, the study asks: Do stakeholders perceive the transparency‐based EU lobbying regulation regime to be a legitimate form of regulatory governance? The study answers by building on a classic model of targeted transparency and proposes perceived regulatory effectiveness and sustainability as two key dimensions on which to evaluate the legitimacy of the Register. The arguments are tested on a new dataset reporting the evaluations of 1,374 stakeholders on the design and performance of the EU lobbying regulation regime. The findings describe a transparency regime that scores low in perceived effectiveness and moderate to low in sustainability . Citizens criticise the quality of information disclosed and the Register's performance as a transparency instrument. The Register did not effectively bridge the information gap between the public and interest groups about supranational lobbying. In terms of sustainability, interest organisations appreciate the systemic benefits of transparency, but identify few organisation‐level benefits. Organisations that are policy insiders incur more transparency costs so they instrumentally support transparency only insofar it suits their lobbying strategies and does not threaten their position. Insiders support including additional categories of organisations in the Register's regulatory remit but not more types of interactions with policy makers. They support an imperfect regulatory status quo to which they have adapted but lack incentives to support increased transparency and information disclosure. Targeted transparency proves an ineffective approach to regulating interest groups’ participation in EU policy making, constituting a suboptimal choice for ensuring transparent, accountable and legitimate supranational lobbying.

Unpacking the Transparency-Secrecy Nexus: Frontstage and backstage behaviour in a political party

Unmanaged Transparency in a Digital Society: Swiss army knife or double-edged sword?

Opening up by closing off: how increased transparency triggers informalisation in EU decision-making

The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age

Transparency: a two‐way mirror?

The transparency trap

Ambiguity and vagueness in party competition

Should transparency be (in-)transparent? On monitoring aversion and cooperation in teams

From open government to open parties in Europe. A framework for analysis

The Multi-Faceted Concept of Transparency

Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony

Pay Transparency: Advancing Theory and Empirical Knowledge

Transparency and Policymaking with Endogenous Information Provision

A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory

Transparency as a means to conquer conflicts of interest is illusory

The political origins of corporate transparency: forging strange coalitions through information rules and policy entrepreneurship

From Universalizing Transparency to the Interplay of Transparency Matrices: Critical insights from the emerging social credit system in China

Enabling Versatile Privacy Interfaces Using Machine-Readable Transparency Information

Hidden agendas: shining a light on the dark side of public policy

On the Price of Transparency: A Comparison between Overt Persuasion and Covert Signaling

Legitimacy through targeted transparency? Regulatory effectiveness and sustainability of lobbying regulation in the European Union