Abstract:Purpose Transparency is assumed to improve markets' efficiency, to enhance better corporate governance and finally, to ensure moralisation of business life. The paper aims to the realities that prevailing discourses on transparency dissimulate. Design/methodology/approach First, a genealogical method is used to explore the theoretical roots, which underpin claims for a greater transparency (reduction of information asymmetry in academic discourses). Second, the analogies between mainstream theories on corporate governance (which legitimate the demand for transparency) and the Panopticon, the famous architecture conceived by Bentham are pinpointed. Finally, the reflections developed by philosophers such as Ricoeur and Henriot on ethics are exploited to explain why transparency is unable to produce the expected effects. Findings First, discourses on transparency often conceal reinsurance manœuvres and power struggles. Second, transparency appears as a modernised manifestation of panopticism: a common base (the concept of utility), the same fundamental assumption (the opportunistic nature of man) and a similar answer (discipline). More generally, panopticism and discourses on transparency are embedded in the same utilitarian philosophy which does not grant any space either for responsibility or for ethics and therefore, favours generalised amorality. Research limitations/implications As a consequence it is suggested that one should explore the possibility of elaborating an economics theory, which would get rid of the concept of utility and a theory of the enterprise, which would take as key concepts creativity and trust, instead of opportunism. Originality/value Through the deconstruction of prevailing discourses on transparency, the paper points to the intrinsic anti‐humanistic character of mainstream economics and organisation theories and suggests alternative issues. It therefore may contribute to both enlightenment and emancipatory aims (in the Habermasian sense).

From Universalizing Transparency to the Interplay of Transparency Matrices: Critical insights from the emerging social credit system in China

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age

The Multi-Faceted Concept of Transparency

Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony

Governing (through) trustworthiness: technologies of power and subjectification in China’s social credit system

What Are You Hiding? Algorithmic Transparency and User Perceptions

Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems

Trustworthy Transparency by Design

Transparency: a two‐way mirror?

Should transparency be (in-)transparent? On monitoring aversion and cooperation in teams

"I had a solid theory before but it's falling apart": Polarizing Effects of Algorithmic Transparency

Unmanaged Transparency in a Digital Society: Swiss army knife or double-edged sword?

We’re just data: Exploring China’s social credit system in relation to digital platform ratings cultures in Westernised democracies

Explaining Government’s Online Transparency on Collaborative Policy Platforms: Risk Management and Configurational Conditions

Through the Looking-Glass: Transparency Implications and Challenges in Enterprise AI Knowledge Systems

A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory

The Sound of One Hand Clapping: Transparency Without Accountability

How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface

Transparent human - (non-) transparent technology? The Janus-faced call for transparency in AI-based health care technologies

Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics’