Abstract:Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit

Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control

Attention with or Without Working Memory: Mnemonic Reselection of Attended Information.

A new aspect of cognitive selectivity: Working memory reselection for attended information

Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review

More Attention with Less Working Memory: the Active Inhibition of Attended but Outdated Information

Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: Evidence from accuracy and eye movements

[Working Memory and Controlled Attention]

Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Attention Control: A Cornerstone of Higher-Order Cognition

Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention

Retaining Gestalt integration in working memory requires domain-specific attention

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory

Individual differences in selective attention reveal the nonmonotonicity of visual spatial attention and its association with working memory capacity.

Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control

Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity

What makes working memory work? A multifaceted account of the predictive power of working memory capacity

The visual familiarity effect on attentional working memory maintenance

Tracking how attentional focusing in working memory benefits long-term memory

Working memory processing boosts the neural representation of long-term memories