Abstract:Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

More Attention with Less Working Memory: the Active Inhibition of Attended but Outdated Information

[Working Memory and Controlled Attention]

Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention

Attention with or Without Working Memory: Mnemonic Reselection of Attended Information.

A new aspect of cognitive selectivity: Working memory reselection for attended information

Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: Evidence from accuracy and eye movements

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

Working Memory Capacity and Visual–Verbal Cognitive Load Modulate Auditory–Sensory Gating in the Brainstem: Toward a Unified View of Attention

Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.

Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit

Individual differences in selective attention reveal the nonmonotonicity of visual spatial attention and its association with working memory capacity.

Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention

Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention

The Relevance of Attention Control, Not Working Memory, in Human Factors

Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition

Focusing attention in human working memory and long-term memory: benefits through dissociable processes

The Interplay Between Multisensory Processing and Attention in Working Memory: Behavioral and Neural Indices of Audio-Visual Object Storage