Abstract:Abstract Although legitimacy theory provides strong arguments that environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and performance can help mitigate firm-specific (idiosyncratic) risks, this relationship has been repeatedly challenged by conceptual arguments, such as ‘transparency fallacy’ or ‘impression management’, and mixed empirical evidence. Therefore, we investigate this relationship in the revelatory case of initial public offerings (IPOs), which represent the first sale of common stock to the wider public. IPOs are characterised by strong information asymmetry between firm insiders and society, while at the same time suffering from uncertainty in firm legitimacy, culminating in amplified financial risks for both issuers and investors in aftermarket trading. Using data from the United States, we demonstrate that (1) voluntary ESG disclosure reduces idiosyncratic volatility and downside tail risk and (2) higher ESG ratings have lower associated firm-specific volatility and downside tail risk during the first year of trading in the aftermarket. We provide theoretical arguments for the relationships observed, suggesting that companies striving for ESG performance and communicating their efforts signal their compliance with sustainability-related norms, thus acquiring and upholding a societal license to operate. ESG performance and disclosure help companies build their reputation capital with investors after going public. We also report that ESG disclosure is a more consistent proxy for ex-ante uncertainty as an indicator of aftermarket risk, thereby replacing some of the more conventional measures, such as firm age, offered in the existing literature.

Indirect Costs of the JOBS Act: Disclosures, Information Asymmetry, and Post-IPO Liquidity

The JOBS Act and IPO underpricing

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

Economic Determinants and Consequences of the Proactive Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and Remediation Progress in IPOs

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

Information Disclosure and Adverse Selection Explanations for IPO Underpricing

Pre-and-aftermarket IPO Underpricing: Does Use of Proceeds Disclosure Matter?

Peer Effects of Corporate Disclosures: Evidence From the Registration-Based IPO System in China

Disclosure of Intended Use of Proceeds and Underpricing in Initial Public Offerings

Voluntary Information Disclosure at IPO

ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings

How does the JOBS act affect the rule 144A market?

Risk factor and use of proceeds declarations and their effects on IPO subscription, price ‘fixings’, liquidity and after-market returns

Information Asymmetry in Financial Markets: A Theoretical Review of Its Impact on IPO Underpricing

Mandatory ESG Disclosure, Information Asymmetry, and Litigation Risk: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings

Community social capital, managerial opportunistic behavior, and information uncertainty in IPO firms

Corporate fraud and industry peer effects on IPO underpricing

Japanese IPO Intellectual Capital Information Disclosures and the Effects on their Long-Term Stock Price Performance

The impact of disclosure characteristics of the registration statement for Science and Technology Innovation Board on the IPO underpricing

Disclosure of Downside Risk and Investors' Use of Qualitative Information: Evidence from the IPO Prospectus's Risk Factor Section

Soft Strategic Information and IPO Underpricing