Abstract:Abstract Although legitimacy theory provides strong arguments that environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and performance can help mitigate firm-specific (idiosyncratic) risks, this relationship has been repeatedly challenged by conceptual arguments, such as ‘transparency fallacy’ or ‘impression management’, and mixed empirical evidence. Therefore, we investigate this relationship in the revelatory case of initial public offerings (IPOs), which represent the first sale of common stock to the wider public. IPOs are characterised by strong information asymmetry between firm insiders and society, while at the same time suffering from uncertainty in firm legitimacy, culminating in amplified financial risks for both issuers and investors in aftermarket trading. Using data from the United States, we demonstrate that (1) voluntary ESG disclosure reduces idiosyncratic volatility and downside tail risk and (2) higher ESG ratings have lower associated firm-specific volatility and downside tail risk during the first year of trading in the aftermarket. We provide theoretical arguments for the relationships observed, suggesting that companies striving for ESG performance and communicating their efforts signal their compliance with sustainability-related norms, thus acquiring and upholding a societal license to operate. ESG performance and disclosure help companies build their reputation capital with investors after going public. We also report that ESG disclosure is a more consistent proxy for ex-ante uncertainty as an indicator of aftermarket risk, thereby replacing some of the more conventional measures, such as firm age, offered in the existing literature.

Economic Determinants and Consequences of the Proactive Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and Remediation Progress in IPOs

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Disclosure of Intended Use of Proceeds and Underpricing in Initial Public Offerings

Information Disclosure and Adverse Selection Explanations for IPO Underpricing

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings

Voluntary Information Disclosure at IPO

Indirect Costs of the JOBS Act: Disclosures, Information Asymmetry, and Post-IPO Liquidity

Peer Effects of Corporate Disclosures: Evidence From the Registration-Based IPO System in China

The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits

Market uncertainty and disclosure of internal control deficiencies under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act

Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty

Pre-and-aftermarket IPO Underpricing: Does Use of Proceeds Disclosure Matter?

Community social capital, managerial opportunistic behavior, and information uncertainty in IPO firms

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Determinants and economic consequences of voluntary disclosure of internal control weaknesses in China

Limited Attention, Legalized Bribery and the Initial Public Offering Process

Environmental disclosure by companies involved in initial public offerings