Abstract:The behavior of short-term debt for long-term investment (SFLI) will probably worsen the business status of the enterprise and increase the financial risk of the enterprise. Will the credit term structure of heavily polluting enterprises improve or worsen as the environmental regulatory pressure increases? This study takes the implementation of China's new Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate the impact of environmental regulatory pressure on the short-term debt for long-term investment behavior of heavy-polluting enterprises by the approach of Difference-in-Differences (DID). The results reveals that the NEPL significantly helps heavy-polluting enterprises achieve a more sustainable development mode by alleviating their maturity mismatch problem between investment and financing of heavy-polluting enterprises, which is conducive to reducing business risks. The impact mechanisms test shows that environmental regulatory pressure is likely to inhibit their investment and financing behavior, and might generate a crowding-out effect of innovation. When considering the heterogeneity of enterprise, the impact of the NEPL is not significant in state-owned enterprises, key-monitoring enterprises, and large-scale enterprises. However, the non-consistent effect as well as the innovation crowding-out effect, need more collaborative governance countermeasures. This paper reveals the consequences of environmental regulation policies from the view of corporate's credit term structure and provides new evidence for supporting the Porter hypothesis through addressing the dilemma of SFLI in heavily polluting enterprises.

Financial Constraints and Corporate Environmental Policies

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Do Financial Constraints Curb Firms’ Efforts to Control Pollution? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Air Pollution and Corporate Green Financial Constraints: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Does corporate environmental investment impede financial performance of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of financial constraints

Environmental regulation and financial stability: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Investigating the ‘Short Pain’ and ‘Long Gain’ Effect of Environmental Regulation on Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Polluting Firms

Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Corporate Environmental Performance

The Effects of Mandatory Pollution Abatement on Corporate Investment and Performance: Theory and Evidence from a U.S. Regulation

Environmental Protection Tax Policy and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

The Role of Financial Constraints in Firm Investment under Pollution Abatement Regulation

The effect of the new Environmental Protection Law on corporate financialization in China

Finance and Pollution : Do Credit Conditions Affect Toxic Emissions ?

Environmental regulatory pressures and the short-term debt for long-term investment of heavy-polluting enterprises: quasi-natural experiment from China

Environmental Regulation and Corporate Financing—Quasi-Natural Experiment Evidence from China

Do environmental regulations affect firm's cash holdings? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

Environmental regulation, agency costs and financial performance: based on the release of "the new Environmental Protection Law"

The Impact of Local Government Environmental Target Constraints on the Performance of Heavy Pollution Industries

Do environmental target constraints promote corporate pollution reduction?

Environmental Regulations, Agency Costs, and Firm Performance

Corporate ESG Performance and Financing Constraints: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies