Abstract:According to the classical theories of automaticity, automatic processing is considered entirely stimulus- triggered and independent of top-down control of attention. Automatic processes elicited by unconscious stimuli are not needed in capacity-limited attentional resources. Furthermore, the classical theories highlight the inflexibility of the cognitive system. Namely, conscious information processes would be massively influenced by various unconscious processes. Such inflexibility would require for much conscious control as intended actions could only be ensured by inhibiting numerous interfering response tendencies. In contrast to these classical conceptions, Kiefer and Martens (2010) recently developed an attentional sensitization model of unconscious cognition, which allows for more flexibility and adaptability of automatic processing or unconscious cognitive processing, and the cognitive system has to be configured by attention and task sets in order for automatic processes to occur. Research on unconscious perception has long been known, but the controversies about researching methods and theoretical interpretations in empirical findings have not been resolved. However, in the past few years, it has become increasingly apparent that factors such as attention allocation, intentions, and task sets do influence on the processes that underlie unconscious perception. Kiefer and Martens (2010) argue that higher level task representations configuring the cognitive system in a way of task-congruent processing streams. In view of the above theoretically different opinions, this research aims to extend the findings of attentional sensitization theory that unconscious semantic stimulus processing is dependent not only on the activation of a semantic processing, but also on the extent to which participants assign attention to specific semantic stimulus dimensions and features. In the present research, the Stroop task paradigm was used because the Stroop paradigm was the most robust findings in attentional research that the time to name a color was lengthened markedly in the presence of an irrelevant word, and the Stroop effect was considered the hallmark of automatic processing. The Stroop paradigm would be appropriate to verify the unconscious processing. In three experiments, we used color words, homonyms of color words and color semantic associative words as priming words, and employed several stringent measures to prevent participants from attending to the irrelevant words, including the priming words' semantics and physical colors separated from time and space; Each words were outside the focus of spatial attention and their visibility were decreased so as to discuss whether the automatic processing was constrained by attentional resources, and whether the participants obtained different amount of attentional resources could make a difference in automated processing. The results showed that: (1) Automatic processes are heavily dependent on the attentional resources, and the automated processes were terminated when the color words could not obtain the attentional resources. (2) The amount of available attentional resources regulated the efficiency and effectiveness of automatic processing, the more attentional resources obtained, the larger significant semantic priming effects to the target stimulus. The results supported the hypothesis of attentional sensitization model that automatic processes were susceptible to top-down control by the higher level cognitive system.

Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task

Are animates special? Exploring the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning

The animacy (bias) effect in recognition: testing the influence of intentionality of learning and retrieval quality

In the absence of animacy: superordinate category structure affects subordinate label verification

The breadth of animacy in memory: New evidence from prospective memory

Neutral animals matter: Animacy modulates object-based attentional allocation

Remembering the Living

The role of animacy in language production: evidence from bare noun naming

Distinct processing for pictures of animals and objects: evidence from eye movements.

Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall.

Communicative intentions automatically hold attention - evidence from event-related potentials

Comparative fMRI reveals differences in the functional organization of the visual cortex for animacy perception in dogs and humans

A novel variation of the Stroop task reveals reflexive supremacy of peripheral over gaze stimuli in pro and anti saccades

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

Separate timescales for spatial and anatomical information processing during action observation

The Influence of Attentional Control on Stimulus Processing is Category Specific in Stroop Tasks

Is color words identification really not needed in attentional resources? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm

Behavior in a visual search task with moving dot stimuli

Semantic generalization of value-based attentional priority

Neural Dynamics of Animacy Processing in Language Comprehension: ERP Evidence from the Interpretation of Classifier–noun Combinations