Long-Term Outcomes of PETTICOAT Technique-Assisted Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for the Treatment of Acute and Subacute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection
Shuaishuai Wang,Yonghui Chen,Zongwei Liu,Jianli Ren,Jiayin Guo,Jiaxin Wang,Dongsheng Cui,Jiaxue Bi,Xiangchen Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241286808
2024-10-22
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment technique (PETTICOAT) for the treatment of acute and subacute complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with acute and subacute TBAD who were treated using the PETTICOAT technique at our center between March 2014 and March 2023. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were a composite of complications, such as entry flow, stent-graft-induced new entry (SINE), and re-intervention. Results: The technical success was 92% (46/50). The perioperative mortality was 2% (1/50), and the procedure-related re-intervention was also 2% (1/50). The mean follow-up time was (74.9±33.9) months. The mortality was 4.1% (2/49). The incidence of aortic-related complications was 8.2% (4/49), including new entry flow, 2 retrograde type A aortic dissections, and 1 distal stent graft-induced new entry SINE. The procedure-related re-intervention rate was 4.1% (2/49). After 5 years of follow-up, the total aortic diameter at the renal artery level was reduced from that at the third year of follow-up but was still significantly larger than preoperatively (26.9±6.6 mm vs. 24.1±4.2 mm, p=0.013). While at the covered stent, bare stent, stentless, and celiac artery (CA) levels, the total aortic diameters did not change significantly compared with preoperative values, whereas true lumen (TL) diameters and TL ratios were maintained at obviously higher levels than preoperative. The rate of complete thrombosis of false lumen in the thoracic aortic segment was significantly higher than that in the abdominal aortic segment (79.6% vs 30.6%, p=0.0001). Conclusions: The results indicated that the PETTICOAT technique is safe and effective and could promote positive remodeling of the aorta from the level of the covered stent to the CA. Remodeling of the distal abdominal aorta may fluctuate and requires close follow-up review. Clinical impact: The long-term results from our center suggest that the PETTICOAT technique promotes positive remodeling of the aorta from the level of the covered stent to the CA; whereas this advantage does not seem to be significant in the more distal segment of the abdominal aorta, mainly at the level of RA and distal. Therefore, further procedures may be required for aortic dissection of the abdominal segment. In addition, aortic remodeling may fluctuate to some extent during the follow-up period, especially in the abdominal visceral region, so close follow-up review is quite important, and prompt re-intervention is required if necessary.