The extended PETTICOAT technique does not guarantee favorable remodeling after acute type B aortic dissection

Maciej Molski,Marta Jankowska,Krystian Mross,Anita Rybicka,Tomasz Jędrzejczak,Arkadiusz Kazimierczak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2022.120375
Abstract:Introduction: Favorable remodeling is not always observed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in acute complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Existing distal re-entries might be the cause of that. Many more extensive techniques have been introduced and evaluated. None of them achieve proven benefit in long-term follow-up. Aim: A new technique called extended PETTICOAT (provisional extension to induce complete attachment) or e-PETTICOAT technique was published in 2018. It allows one to cover proximal and distal re-entries and consists of: combined implantation of a thoracic stent graft to seal the proximal entry; self-expandable stents in the visceral aorta to expand the true lumen; plus two parallel kissing iliac stent grafts below the renal arteries. Despite encouraging medium term results, it has unknown long-term consequences. Material and methods: The prospective observational single center study included 11 patients with complicated acute TBAD qualified for endovascular treatment using the e-PETTICOAT technique. Complicated acute TBAD was identified only in cases of clinical manifestation before or at the time of intervention; radiological findings were not sufficient to identify complications in our study. Method: The 5-year follow-up, based on clinical outcome including survival, re-interventions and angio-CT-assessed remodeling, was examined. Results: The e-PETTICOAT technique achieves good remodeling in 38% of primary and 88% of secondary procedures. Conclusions: The E-PETTICOAT does not guarantee favorable remodeling during a 5-year follow-up in acute complicated TBAD. Complex aortic repair after e-PETTICOAT might be needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?