Breeding and Genetics: Genomic Selection and Whole-Genome Association
H. Wang,B. Woodward,S. Bauck,R.,Rekaya,H. Li,Z. Wang,F. Schenkel,M.,Sargolzaei,S. Moore,P. Stothard,A. A. Boligon,N. Long,L. G. Albuquerque,K. Weigel,D.,Gianola,G. Rosa
2011-01-01
Abstract:The objectives of this study were to conduct multiple-trait (MT) genomic evaluations and to compare bias and accuracy of genomic breeding values (GBV) with those from single-trait (ST) genomic evaluations, using different genomic relationship matrices (G). Genomic evaluations were conducted for 18 linear type traits of US Holsteins using genomic and phenotypic combined data. For each of 6931 bulls, 38,416 SNP markers were used as genomic information. A single-step approach was used to predict GBV with G that assumed various allele frequencies: equal (p = q = 0.5) (GE), base (GB), current (GC), and current with scaled G (GCS). Data sets contained 8,865,120 records for 5,657,787 cows from 2009 data and 7,715,925 records for 4,813,726 cows from 2004 data. Coefficients of determination (R2) and regressions (δ) of 2004 GBV on 2009 daughter deviations were calculated, as statistics of accuracy and bias, respectively, for 1307 young bulls. Parent averages (PA) were also calculated for 2004 data with no genomic information. With MT (ST) models, average R2 (%) were 20.5 (18.6) and 37.9 (34.6), 37.3 (34.1), 35.9 (34.2) and 37.7 (34.5), and average δ ( × 100) were 76.7 (77.3) and 79.8 (79.4), 76.3 (75.0), 74.7 (73.8) and 76.7 (76.2), for PA and for GBV with GE, GB, GC and GCS, respectively. When the weight for the inverse of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals was reduced to 0.7, R2 remained almost identical while the average δ increased to 92.7 with GE, 90.7 with GB, 89.2 with GC, and 91.9 with GCS for MT models. The ST models required a stricter convergence criterion of 10−14 than that of 10−11 for MT models to achieve the same accuracy. The GBV obtained from MT models are more accurate than those from ST models. Modifying the weight for pedigree relationships of genotyped animals reduces bias in GBV. Multiple trait large-scale genomic evaluation is computationally feasible.