Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models

Haoran Ma,Hongwei Li,Fei Ge,Huqiong Zhao,Bo Zhu,Lupei Zhang,Huijiang Gao,Lingyang Xu,Junya Li,Zezhao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020253
IF: 4.141
2024-02-19
Genes
Abstract:Numerous studies have shown that combining populations from similar or closely related genetic breeds improves the accuracy of genomic predictions (GP). Extensive experimentation with diverse Bayesian and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models have been developed to explore multi-breed genomic selection (GS) in livestock, ultimately establishing them as successful approaches for predicting genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using BayesR and GBLUP models with linkage disequilibrium (LD)-weighted genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) for genomic prediction in three different beef cattle breeds to identify the best approach for enhancing the accuracy of multi-breed genomic selection in beef cattle. Additionally, a comparison was conducted to evaluate the predictive precision of different marker densities and genetic correlations among the three breeds of beef cattle. The GRM between Yunling cattle (YL) and other breeds demonstrated modest affinity and highlighted a notable genetic concordance of 0.87 between Chinese Wagyu (WG) and Huaxi (HX) cattle. In the within-breed GS, BayesR demonstrated an advantage over GBLUP. The prediction accuracies for HX cattle using the BayesR model were 0.52 with BovineHD BeadChip data (HD) and 0.46 with whole-genome sequencing data (WGS). In comparison to the GBLUP model, the accuracy increased by 26.8% for HD data and 9.5% for WGS data. For WG and YL, BayesR doubled the within-breed prediction accuracy to 14.3% from 7.1%, outperforming GBLUP across both HD and WGS datasets. Moreover, analyzing multiple breeds using genomic selection showed that BayesR consistently outperformed GBLUP in terms of predictive accuracy, especially when using WGS. For instance, in a mixed reference population of HX and WG, BayesR achieved a significant accuracy of 0.53 using WGS for HX, which was a substantial enhancement over the accuracies obtained with GBLUP models. The research further highlights the benefit of including various breeds in the reference group, leading to enhanced accuracy in predictions and emphasizing the importance of comprehensive genomic selection methods. Our research findings indicate that BayesR exhibits superior performance compared to GBLUP in multi-breed genomic prediction accuracy, achieving a maximum improvement of 33.3%, especially in genetically diverse breeds. The improvement can be attributed to the effective utilization of higher single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker density by BayesR, resulting in enhanced prediction accuracy. This evidence conclusively demonstrates the significant impact of BayesR on enhancing genomic predictions in diverse cattle populations, underscoring the crucial role of genetic relatedness in selection methodologies. In parallel, subsequent studies should focus on refining GRM and exploring alternative models for GP.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using BayesR and GBLUP models combined with Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) weighted Genomic Relationship Matrices (GRMs) for multi-breed genomic prediction in beef cattle, and to identify the best method to improve the accuracy of multi-breed Genomic Selection (GS) in beef cattle. Specifically, the study assesses the prediction accuracy of BayesR and GBLUP in three different beef cattle breeds (Yunling cattle, Huaxi cattle, and Chinese Wagyu) by comparing different marker densities (high-density chip data HD and whole-genome sequencing data WGS) and genetic correlations between different breeds. The study found: 1. **Advantages of BayesR**: - For Huaxi cattle (HX), the prediction accuracy of BayesR was 0.52 using HD data and 0.46 using WGS data, which was 26.8% and 9.5% higher than GBLUP, respectively. - For Yunling cattle (YL) and Chinese Wagyu (WG), BayesR improved the prediction accuracy from 7.1% to 14.3%, significantly outperforming GBLUP. 2. **Multi-breed Genomic Selection**: - In multi-breed reference populations, the prediction accuracy of BayesR was generally higher than that of GBLUP, especially when using WGS data. - The study also emphasized the importance of including multiple breeds in the reference population to enhance prediction accuracy. In summary, the paper mainly explores how to utilize BayesR and GBLUP models for genomic prediction performance in different beef cattle breeds, particularly the superiority of BayesR in multi-breed genomic selection.