Endotracheal Tube Obstruction by Unexpected Blood Clot in Anesthetized Children: a Report of Three Cases
Fu Shan Xue,Nong He,Mao Ping Luo,Xu Liao,Yan Ming Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02951.x
2009-01-01
Paediatric Anaesthesia
Abstract:McGaw, IL, USA) returned a small amount of clear-yellow secretions. ETCO2 and tidal volumes returned to normal. The patient was disconnected from the anesthesia circuit and positioned prone for the procedure. His face was placed on a foam pad (Pediatric Gentletouch 4; Orthopedic Systems, Inc., Union City, CA, USA), and the circuit was reconnected. Shortly after reconnecting the circuit, ETCO2 and tidal volumes decreased to zero, and breath sounds were absent. Positive-pressure ventilation by bag was ineffective. A kink in the tube was suspected, and the patient’s head was repositioned, with no improvement in ventilation. An 8F soft suction catheter was again inserted and upon withdrawal of the catheter, a white foreign body was noted in the endotracheal tube. The foreign body migrated distally with attempts at ventilation, and could not be withdrawn with the 8F catheter. A 10F soft suction catheter was passed, and the foreign body was retrieved. The patient’s oxygen saturation remained above 96% and his heart rate above 100 throughout this time. Tidal volumes and ETCO2 returned to normal, and the rest of the case was uneventful. The foreign body was a 12 · 4 · 5 mm piece of white foam. Upon further inspection, a small gouge in the foam face pad, near the premade passage for the endotracheal tube, was noted and was equal in shape and size to the foreign body. There are numerous case reports of foreign bodies recovered from airways and anesthesia circuits. There are fewer reports of anesthesia equipment obstructing the endotracheal tube. There may be a higher risk with smaller pediatric tubes, as demonstrated by this incident and those cited above. The step of disconnecting and reconnecting the endotracheal tube to the circuit always entails the risk of subsequent complications as the integrity of the circuit is temporarily disrupted. Visual inspection of the circuit should always be undertaken after any disconnection. However, in our situation, only the connector piece of the endotracheal tube was readily visible. The foreign body was initially thought to be a mucus plug, because our patient did have a recent URI and mild ventilatory difficulty at the beginning of the case. Fortunately, positive-pressure ventilation did not push the foam into the bronchial tree, which could have caused more serious complications and required bronchoscopy for retrieval. We are not aware of another instance of this specific complication, despite foam pads being used commonly for surgery in the prone position. Benjamin J . Walker Sally E. Rampersad Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA 98105, USA (email: benjamin.walker@seattlechildrens.org)