Abstract:BACKGROUND:Self-report pain assessment scales may be inappropriate when critically ill patients are incapable of adequate communication because of sedation or mechanical ventilation. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS, for intubated patients) and the BPS-non intubated (BPS-NI, for non-intubated patients) measure objective behavioral indicators of pain in non-communicating critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES:To develop a Chinese version of the BPS combining the original version of the BPS and BPS-NI suitable for pain assessment among critically ill patients and to determine its reliability and validity. DESIGN:Two cross-sectional studies. SETTINGS:A 15-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital in Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS:In the first study, 129 patients (53 intubated and 76 non-intubated) were recruited; in the second study, 83 (43 intubated and 40 non-intubated) were recruited. METHODS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) was developed via rigorous translation methods, including double back-translation and content validation involving 13 clinical experts. Internal consistency, discriminative validity, and criterion-related validity were established using the BPS-C and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The BPS-C and NRS were used to assess pain in 53 intubated and 76 non-intubated post-abdominal surgery patients during low pain exposure and increased pain exposure in the first study. To establish interrater reliability, a researcher and a bedside nurse independently performed 172 paired assessments in 43 intubated patients and 160 paired assessments in 40 non-intubated patients with the BPS-C under the same conditions in the second study. RESULTS:The BPS-C achieved conceptual and semantic equivalence with the original tool. Internal consistency was established through Cronbach's alpha (α=0.724-0.743 in intubated patients, α=0.701-0.762 in non-intubated patients). Interrater reliability was confirmed through the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), which ranged from 0.962 to 1.000 in both intubated and non-intubated patients with high agreement percentages (95.3-100.0% in intubated and 95.0-100.0% in non-intubated patients). BPS-C scores during increased exposure to pain were significantly higher than those obtained during low exposure to pain, indicating discriminative validity. Criterion-related validity was confirmed by strong positive correlations between BPS-C and NRS scores (Pearson's correlations r=0.815-0.937 for intubated patients, Pearson's correlations r=0.755-0.899 for non-intubated patients). CONCLUSIONS:The Chinese version of the BPS (BPS-C) is appropriate for pain assessment among intubated and non-intubated ICU patients.

Reliability and validity of the Brief Pain Inventory in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Reliability and Validity of a Modified 8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Patients with Chronic Pain

Reliability and validity of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain

Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Validation of COPD Population Screener Questionnaire in Chinese Population: A National Multicenter Study

Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of a Modified Brief Pain Inventory: A Concise Instrument for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the behavioral pain scale in intubated and non-intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies

Brief Pain Inventory: A proposal to extend its clinical application

The Reliability and Validity of the "activity and Participation" Component in the Brief ICF Core Set for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Based on Rasch Analysis.

Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Subscale: Assessing Interference With Daily Living Activities in Older Adults With Multisite Musculoskeletal Pain

The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure

Do baseline patient reported outcome measures predict changes in self-reported function, following a chronic pain rehabilitation programme?

Validation of the Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Pain Problems for Patients with Mild and Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - A Community-Based Study in Shanghai

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

Benefits of using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with cancer pain: an intervention study conducted in Swedish hospitals

The Dutch functional performance inventory: validity and reliability in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease

Pain interference type and level guide the assessment process in chronic pain: Categorizing pain patients entering tertiary pain treatment with the Brief Pain Inventory

Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Development and preliminary validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scale quality of life instruments for chronic diseases-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on classical test theory and generalizability theory

Measuring Pain-related Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation System Responses