Abstract:With the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a new generation of editing methods that convert specific bases has enabled precise single-base mutations. To date, conversion of cytosine to thymidine and adenine to guanine has been achieved using the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1 and adenosine deaminase (TadA), respectively. However, the base editing efficiency can be unacceptably low in some cell types or at certain target loci. One reason might be the lack of a selective pressure against the survival of non-edited cells. Few studies on ABE in prokaryotes have been reported, probably due to the relatively low editing efficiency of TadA. Improving the editing efficiency is the key for establishing base editing techniques and especially the ABE technologies. In this work, a selective pressure against non-edited cells was implemented to increase the base editing efficiency. Firstly, we fused nCas9 or dCas9 with TadA to compare the editing efficiency of nCas9-TadA and dCas9-TadA fusion complexes in the model prokaryote Escherichia coli. While nCas9-TadA was able to achieve A to G base editing (ABE) with a moderate efficiency, dCas9-TadA had a very low efficiency. To enrich for edited cells and increase the base-editing efficiency, we utilized the induction of double-strand breaks by active Cas9, which leads to the death of prokaryotic cells. By introducing an inducible active Cas9 with the same editing gRNA as the nCas9-TadA in the base editing process, the cells with non-edited target bases remained vulnerable to Cas9 and were eliminated. Thus, a double-check base editing (DBE) method was established, which significantly improved the editing efficiency of ABE in E. coli, reaching 99.0% for some sites. By placing a selective pressure against non-edited cells, the DBE strategy might also be applied to various scenarios to increase the efficiency of many different base editing targets or even for epigenetic DNA modification techniques.

EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing

EditR: A novel base editing quantification software using Sanger sequencing

Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors

Programmable RNA base editing via targeted modifications

A cytosine deaminase for programmable single-base RNA editing

Towards optimizing diversifying base editors for high-throughput studies of single-nucleotide variants

Precision RNA base editing with engineered and endogenous effectors

Double-Check Base Editing for Efficient A to G Conversions

Highly Efficient Base Editing in Rabbit by Using Near-Pamless Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 Variants

MultiEditR: An easy validation method for detecting and quantifying RNA editing from Sanger sequencing

An APOBEC3A-Cas9 Base Editor with Minimized Bystander and Off-Target Activities

Precise in vivo RNA base editing with a wobble-enhanced circular CLUSTER guide RNA

REPAIRx, a specific yet highly efficient programmable A > I RNA base editor

Expanding the Genome-Targeting Scope and the Site Selectivity of High-Precision Base Editors

Glycosylase-based Base Editors for Efficient T-to-G and C-to-G Editing in Mammalian Cells

Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells

CRISPR-Cas9 DNA Base-Editing and Prime-Editing

Efficient A-to-C Base Editing with High Specificity

A Novel Base Editor SpRY-ABE8eF148A Mediates Efficient A-to-G Base Editing with a Reduced Off-Target Effect

Base Editors: Expanding the Types of DNA Damage Products Harnessed for Genome Editing