Abstract:Interpreters regularly have to make real time decisions about word or sentence meaning in the original text before they can select their best equivalents in the target language. In some situations, the context (linguistic or situational) may help to disambiguate the problematic item. Establishing the fastest way to arrive at the optimal meaning is a crucial skill for interpreters who work without previous knowledge of texts to be translated (as is the case for most conference or court interpreters). Relevance Theory, as formulated by Sperber and Willson (1986/1995) offers insights into two aspects of messages that need to be understood in communication: explicatures and implicatures. While implicatures may seem more problematic to resolve in real life situations, explicatures often pose significant difficulty in translation. This chapter uses examples from court interpretation to discuss both types of interpretation problems and what practical tools Relevance Theory can offer to assist interpreters to solve them. This chapter presents three case studies that illustrate authentic situations from the court interpretation practice. Three case studies are Lexical choices; Pragmatic choices; and Syntactic choices. This chapter discusses the types of interpretation problems and what practical tools Relevance Theory can offer to assist interpreters to solve them. While implicatures may seem more problematic to resolve in real life situations, explicatures often pose significant difficulty in translation. One of the fundamentals of Relevance Theory is the observation that the relationship between semantic representations of sentences and what is in fact communicated is not simple. D. Sperber and D. Wilson suggest that this gap "is filled not by more coding, but by inference". Over the early decades of the 21st century, the field of Translation Studies witnessed a steady departure from theoretical investigations in favour of the implementation of various types of empirical research to gain insights into the translation process.

Argumentation, Relevance Theory and persuasion

The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising

Image–text coherence and its implications for multimodal AI

Metaphor Interpretation and Motivation in Relevance Theory

The relevance theory, pragmatics and the problem of meaning

Multimodal Humour: Integrating Blending Model, Relevance Theory, and Incongruity Theory

Visual Persuasion: Inferring Communicative Intents of Images

A Bayesian Approach to Direct and Inverse Abstract Argumentation Problems

Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasion

A Principle-Based Robustness Analysis of Admissibility-Based Argumentation Semantics

A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings

Partial Semantics of Argumentation: Basic Properties and Empirical

Relevance theory and the social realities of communication

A Relevance-theoretic Approach to Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A Case Study of Emoji Advertising

Relevance Theory, Semantic Content and Pragmatic Enrichment

The Cognitive Principle of Relevance and its Application to Anti Iraq War Posters

Equal But Not The Same: Understanding the Implicit Relationship Between Persuasive Images and Text

The Communicative Principle of Relevance

Relevance Theory, interpreting, and translation

Rethinking Offensive Text Detection as a Multi-Hop Reasoning Problem

[The effects of information relevance to speaker vs. hearer on the use of comment expressions and interrogative sentences in the Japanese language]