Abstract:Since the first report of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) using da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in 1999, the robotic technology has been applied to internal thoracic artery (ITA) harvesting for more than 10 years. We present the experience of robotic ITA skeletonized harvesting in 200 cases using the da Vinci S or da Vinci SI Surgical System. The learning curves of ITA harvesting time and the results of ITA graft patency were evaluated. METHODS Patients Between January 2007 and August 2012, a total of 200 patients underwent totally robotic ITA takedown, including 154 males and 46 females aged 33-79 years (mean 58 years). The procedures of robotic-assisted CABG on beating heart were completed in two ways:1, 2 to harvest the ITA, followed by a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft (MIDCAB); and to harvest the ITA, followed by totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (BH-TECAB). The performance of robotic ITA harvesting, MIDCAB and TECAB was approved by the Institutional Review Board of People's Liberation Army General Hospital and informed consent was obtained. Surgical methods After routine induction of anesthesia, double-lumen intubation was carried out for single right lung ventilation. Three 0.8 to 1.0-cm incisions were made in the 3rd, 5th and 7th intercostal spaces that located about 3 cm lateral of the midclavicular line. After deflation of the left lung, carbon dioxide insufflation was initialed through the cameral port and maintained at an average pressure of 6 to 8 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The surgical cart of robotic surgical system docked to the camera and instrument ports. A 30-degree angle upward camera and micro-instruments were inserted. First, the fascia and muscles covering the ITA were transected along the entire length. The skeletonized ITA was developed from the lateral edge medially using blunt dissection and short bursts of low power monopolar cautery to mobilize the anterior attachments (Figure 1). Small intercostal branches were ligated with monopolar energy and the large intercostal branches were clipped for hemostasis. The entire length of ITA was dissected from the first intercostal branch to the diaphragm. The right ITA can be harvested after dissecting the anterior mediastinum. The left ITA was harvested followed the right ITA harvesting in double ITAs harvesting. The ITA harvesting time was defined from completed port placement to completed ITA detachment from thoracic wall. For calculation of the learning curve, regression analysis with logarithmic curve fit was used.Figure 1.: The robotic skeletonized ITA was harvested using monopolar cautery.RESULTS All the ITAs were harvested successfully in a skeletonized fashion. There were no major technical failures of the robotic system. One hundred and ninety-one left ITAs, 5 right ITAs and 4 double-ITAs were harvested. After robotic ITA harvesting, 120 patients underwent MIDCAB and 80 patients underwent BH-TECAB. The mean time of single ITA harvesting was (35.8±10.7) minutes (18 to 70). A significant learning curve was observed: y(min) = 58.0-5.3×ln(x), x = ITA takedown number; P<0.01, r2 = 0.33 (Figure 2). Harvesting time decreased from 41 minutes (median) in the first 30 cases to 29 minutes (median) in the last 30 cases.Figure 2.: The learning curve for robotic ITA harvesting. Followed the formula: y (min) = 58.0-5.3×ln (x).One hundred and ninety-five patients (97.5%) accepted the follow-up of graft patency before discharging, including 130 cases of CT angiography (CTA) scan and 65 patients coronary angiography. Both coronary angiography and CTA scan showed 100.0% graft patency. Unexpectedly, the angiography showed that left ITA graft in the middle segment developed a collateral branch in 2 patients. However, the patients were asymptomatic. One left ITA graft stenosis in TECAB group at 1year, and one in MIDCAB group at 2 years were found. The graft patency decreased as time went by. The ITA patency was 98.1% at 1 year, 97.8% at 2 years, respectively. And no more ITA occlusion was found at 3 to 5 years. DISCUSSION The superiority of ITA as a conduit has been well established for long-term patency and event-free survival. With the development of robotic cardiac surgery, the heart surgeon has had the possibility to perform ITA takedown totally endoscopically. Robotic harvesting of ITA is the first step toward a totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft. We have harvested the ITAs in 200 cases using da Vinci S or da Vinci SI surgical system including right ITA and bilateral ITAs. The skeletonized fashion was used in this group that can provide increased graft length as well as a larger anastomotic diameter compared with pedicled fashion. In our experiences, the skeletonized ITA harvesting using da Vinci System was feasible and safe, but more time consuming and demanding than traditional technique. With robotic assistance, the harvesting for bilateral ITAs was easier than conventional method. Robotic instrument allows the entire lengths of the bilateral ITAs to be harvested in a skeletonized fashion, resulting in greater conduit lengths and enabling multi-vessel grafting.3 After passing through a learning curve, ITAs takedown can be done in an acceptable time. In this study, the harvesting time was stable after about 30 cases and decreased with the cases number increasing. Long preparation times at the beginning may be explained by the complexity of this new system and the lack of clinical experience of the operation team.4 The harvesting time can reduce to an acceptable duration between 30 to 40 minutes after the learning curve. And there are several reports that the early clinical results were excellent. But the longer-term graft patency and clinical freedom from graft failure have remained a major concern. In our group, 97.5% patients underwent coronary angiography or CTA scan before discharge and the remaining patients (2.5%) refused to undergo follow up. After discharge, all patients were followed up by CTA scan, which is easily tolerated and accepted by the patients although conventional coronary angiography remains the gold standard for evaluation of graft patency.5 Our graft patency is comparable to the results for conventional CABG, and off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery. Limitations are as follows: This was a single center, single surgeon study of a highly selected group of patients. Other risk factors leading to ITA graft occlusion were not included in the current study. In conclusion, our study shows that robotic-enhanced ITA takedown is prerequisite for TECAB or MIDCAB operations and can be safely implemented. After passing through a learning curve, ITA takedown can be done in an acceptable time. It should be conducted by surgeons with extensive surgical experience in open techniques, and requires a stable and well-trained robotic team and overcoming a substantial learning curve.

Is There a Role for Diagonal Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients Undergoing Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery?

Mid-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Reverse Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. A Single Center Experience.

Step-by-step technique of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Total Arterial Revascularization Using the Double-Docking Technique

Robotic Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting: the Learning Curve and Graft Patency

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes

A case of hybrid robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting and valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Coronary bypass surgery guided by computed tomography in a low-risk population

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery revascularization - analysis of 300 cases.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with an Improved Rib Spreader and a New-Shaped Cardiac Stabilizer: Results of 200 Consecutive Cases in a Single Institution

Performance of left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery anastomosis by residents versus attendings and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes

Mid-term Graft Patency of Right Versus Left Internal Mammary Artery As Arterial Conduit Usage for Left Anterior Descending Artery Revascularisation: Insights from a Single-Centre Study of Propensity-Matched Data.

The outcomes of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the Atlantic demographic—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Robot-assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Improves Short-Term Outcomes Compared with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Robot-Assisted MIDCAB Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study With OPCAB Patients

Off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Multiarterial grafting in redo coronary artery bypass grafting: Type of arterial conduit and patient sex determine benefit

Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

A Single-Center Long-Term Follow-Up

Long Stent Implantation on the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery at a Follow-Up of More Than Five Years