Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to highlight the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) techniques in computational docking. The use of smart computational methods in the life cycle of drug design is relatively a recent development that has gained much popularity and interest over the last few years. Central to this methodology is the notion of computational docking which is the process of predicting the best pose (orientation + conformation) of a small molecule (drug candidate) when bound to a target larger receptor molecule (protein) in order to form a stable complex molecule. In computational docking, a large number of binding poses are evaluated and ranked using a scoring function. The scoring function is a mathematical predictive model that produces a score that represents the binding free energy, and hence the stability, of the resulting complex molecule. Generally, such a function should produce a set of plausible ligands ranked according to their binding stability along with their binding poses. In more practical terms, an effective scoring function should produce promising drug candidates which can then be synthesized and physically screened using high throughput screening process. Therefore, the key to computer-aided drug design is the design of an efficient highly accurate scoring function (using ML techniques).METHODS: The methods presented in this paper are specifically based on ML techniques. Despite many traditional techniques have been proposed, the performance was generally poor. Only in the last few years started the application of the ML technology in the design of scoring functions; and the results have been very promising.MATERIAL: The ML-based techniques are based on various molecular features extracted from the abundance of protein-ligand information in the public molecular databases, e.g., protein data bank bind (PDBbind).RESULTS: In this paper, we present this paradigm shift elaborating on the main constituent elements of the ML approach to molecular docking along with the state-of-the-art research in this area. For instance, the best random forest (RF)-based scoring function on PDBbind v2007 achieves a Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted and experimentally determined binding affinities of 0.803 while the best conventional scoring function achieves 0.644. The best RF-based ranking power ranks the ligands correctly based on their experimentally determined binding affinities with accuracy 62.5% and identifies the top binding ligand with accuracy 78.1%.CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with open questions and potential future research directions that can be pursued in smart computational docking; using molecular features of different nature (geometrical, energy terms, pharmacophore), advanced ML techniques (e.g., deep learning), combining more than one ML models.

Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN‐based Multi‐body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI‐score) based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein‐ligand Complexes

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Machine learning in computational docking

A Diverse Benchmark Based on 3D Matched Molecular Pairs for Validating Scoring Functions

AA-Score: a New Scoring Function Based on Amino Acid-Specific Interaction for Molecular Docking

Uni-Mol Docking V2: Towards Realistic and Accurate Binding Pose Prediction

A machine learning approach to predicting protein–ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking

Geometry Optimization Algorithms in Conjunction with the Machine Learning Potential ANI-2x Facilitate the Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Binding Mode Prediction

Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Drug Discoveries from Experimental and Computer-Generated Protein-Ligand Structures: Towards Per-Target Scoring Functions

Estimating protein–ligand interactions with geometric deep learning and mixture density models

iScore: A ML-Based Scoring Function for Drug Discovery

Accurate prediction of protein–ligand interactions by combining physical energy functions and graph-neural networks

Assessing the Performance of the Molecular Mechanics/poisson Boltzmann Surface Area and Molecular Mechanics/generalized Born Surface Area Methods. II. the Accuracy of Ranking Poses Generated from Docking

Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins

Enhance the Performance of Current Scoring Functions with the Aid of 3D Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints.

On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors

Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.

Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

ET‐score: Improving Protein‐ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance‐weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm