Abstract:Property tax represents one among the most feasible, conventional, steady and progressive source of revenue. Nonetheless this form of tax has not received the attention it requires for effective contribution towards revenue generation in developing countries. The situation is however different in developed countries which have made concerted efforts to tap the potentials of property tax to achieve both fiscal and non-fiscal advantages for their communities. While taking this into account the current article conceptualizes the basic principles underlying property taxation as one among the forms of direct taxation while underscoring its value to revenue generation in general perspective. Thereafter specific analysis is made towards its practical regulation in a Tanzanian standpoint in terms of specific laws and regulatory machineries in the country. The analysis revolves around the effectiveness of the existing tax laws and regulatory machineries in ensuring optimum contribution by property tax to the country’s revenue basket. On the basis of doctrinal and empirical data it is revealed that despite its potential to contribute to revenue generation, property tax still faces a number of both legal and non- legal challenges in its administration in the country. The legal challenges include poor legal definition on the concept of property, the flat rate structure on property tax, low deterrence effect of the penal sanctions. The non-legal challenges on the other hand include low registration of property owners and properties for identification purposes, irregular valuation process, low taxpayer education on property tax affecting voluntary property tax compliance and lacking resources for property tax administration by the respective regulatory machineries. As a way to remedy the situation the paper provides a number of legal and non-legal intervention measures. The intervention measures take account of the importance of taxation for developing countries Tanzania inclusive, thus recommending solutions which reasonably combine regulatory convenience with equity and effectiveness. The recommendations are an output of theoretical data, empirical findings and specific international best practices on property taxation. The recommendations focus on legal clarification of the tax base, the method and basis for valuation and provision of required resources for enforcement of relevant laws on property taxation.

Reforming local public finance to reduce resource consumption: the sustainability case for graduated property taxation

The Fairness Issue of Tax Burden in Property Tax Reform

Redistribution Through Tax Relief

The Local Land Finance Transformation with the Synergy of Increment and Inventory: A Case Study in China

Reform Thinkings and Policy Proposals of Property Tax Reform in Development Vision

Land-based finance and property tax in China

Subsidies or green taxes? Evaluating the distributional effects of housing renovation policies among Dutch households

Towards a Sustainable Property Tax System for Regional Development by Integrating the Antifragility Concept

Renewal of Land-Use Term for Urbanization in China: Sword of Damocles or Noah'S Ark?

The Reform Design of Real Estate Property Tax

A Microsimulation of Property Tax Policy in China

Land Stewardship and Development Behaviors Under an Ecological-Impact-Weighted Land Value Tax Scheme: A Proof-of-Concept Agent-Based Model

Paying to save the beach: effects of local finance decisions on coastal management

Climate change and municipal finance: Ordinary innovations for just urban transitions

The Research on the Predicament of Further Promoting the Reform of Real Estate Tax

The Impact Analysis of the Resistance for Property Tax

Regulation of Property Tax in Tanzania: Legal and Administrative Challenges

Strategies of property developers and governments under carbon tax and subsidies

The Impact of Land Value and Real Property Taxation on the Timing of Central City Redevelopment

Addressing Climate Change Through a Low-Cost, High-Impact Carbon Tax

Do local governments tax homeowner communities differently?