Abstract:Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a method, developed by the American social scientist Charles C. Ragin since the 1980s, which has had since then great and ever-increasing success in research applications in various political science subdisciplines and teaching programs. It counts as a broadly recognized addition to the methodological spectrum of political science. QCA is based on set theory. Set theory models “if ... then” hypotheses in a way that they can be interpreted as sufficient or necessary conditions. QCA differentiates between crisp sets in which cases can only be full members or not, while fuzzy sets allow for degrees of membership. With fuzzy sets it is, for example, possible to distinguish highly developed democracies from less developed democracies that, nevertheless, are rather democracies than not. This means that fuzzy sets account for differences in degree without giving up the differences in kind. In the end, QCA produces configurational statements that acknowledge that conditions usually appear in conjunction and that there can be more than one conjunction that implies an outcome (equifinality). There is a strong emphasis on a case-oriented perspective. QCA is usually (but not exclusively) applied in y-centered research designs. A standardized algorithm has been developed and implemented in various software packages that takes into account the complexity of the social world surrounding us, also acknowledging the fact that not every theoretically possible variation of explanatory factors also exists empirically. Parameters of fit, such as consistency and coverage, help to evaluate how well the chosen explanatory factors account for the outcome to be explained. There is also a range of graphical tools that help to illustrate the results of a QCA. Set theory goes well beyond an application in QCA, but QCA is certainly its most prominent variant. There is a very lively QCA community that currently deals with the following aspects: the establishment of a code of standards for QCA applications; QCA as part of mixed-methods designs, such as combinations of QCA and statistical analyses, or a sequence of QCA and (comparative) case studies (via, e.g., process tracing); the inclusion of time aspects into QCA; Coincidence Analysis (CNA, where an a priori decision on which is the explanatory factor and which the condition is not taken) as an alternative to the use of the Quine-McCluskey algorithm; the stability of results; the software development; and the more general question whether QCA development activities should rather target research design or technical issues. From this, a methodological agenda can be derived that asks for the relationship between QCA and quantitative techniques, case study methods, and interpretive methods, but also for increased efforts in reaching a shared understanding of the mission of QCA.

Process tracing and congruence analysis to support theory-based impact evaluation

A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-Theoretic Multimethod Research

Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing

Combining Theories of Change and Realist Evaluation in practice: Lessons from a research on evaluation study

Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: Concepts and considerations

Impact Evaluation to Communicate and Improve Conservation Non-Governmental Organization Performance: the Case of Conservation International

Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute

DoWhy: Addressing Challenges in Expressing and Validating Causal Assumptions

A Two-Step Framework for Validating Causal Effect Estimates

Complexity embraced: a new perspective on the evaluation of organisational interventions

A Guide to Impact Evaluation under Sample Selection and Missing Data: Teacher's Aides and Adolescent Mental Health

A Bayesian multivariate factor analysis model for causal inference using time-series observational data on mixed outcomes

Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Set Theory

Analyzing Two-Phase Single-Case Data with Non-overlap and Mean Difference Indices: Illustration, Software Tools, and Alternatives

The Use of Contribution Analysis in Evaluating Health Interventions: A Scoping Review

Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition

A systematic comparison of non-overlap metrics and visual analysis in single-case experimental design

Counterfactual Reasoning for Process Optimization Using Structural Causal Models

Social impact assessment and (realist) evaluation: meeting of the methods

Mixed-methods impact evaluation in international development practice: distinguishing between quant-led and qual-led models

An activity theory study of data, knowledge, and power in the design of an international development NGO impact evaluation