Co-Developing Theories of Change for Improved Community-Based Violence Intervention Evaluation
Julia P. Schleimer,Vivian Lyons,Dominique Smith,Fatima Ali,Latasha Averett,Marcel Baugh,Lina Benson,Jacques Colon,Jaclyn Cook,Dominique Davis,Marie Diandy,Aaron Fox,Elaine Gonzalez,Aaron Johnson,Alvin Boomer Lowe,Marvin Marshall,Bridgette Maryman,Vicky McLaurin,Deepika Nehra,Alfredo Orozco,Katoya Palmer,Rafael Serrano,Zoe Shrader,Carolyn Thurston,Erin Watlington,Laura Waskewitz,Emily Westlake,Kristian Jones,Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004277
2024-03-23
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Abstract:Community-based violence intervention (CVI) programs are considered important strategies for preventing community violence and promoting health and safety. Mixed and inconclusive results from some prior CVI evaluations—and our general lack of understanding about the reasons for such varied findings—may be explained in part by misalignment of program theories of change and evaluation measures. Further, most prior evaluations have focused solely on deficit-based outcomes; this narrow focus is inconsistent with the premise of CVI and may fail to capture improvements in health and wellbeing that are on the hypothesized pathway from intervention to violence reduction.
surgery,critical care medicine