Sex differences in social brain neural responses in autism: temporal profiles of configural face-processing within data-driven time windows
Teresa Del Bianco,Meng-Chuan Lai,Luke Mason,Mark H. Johnson,Tony Charman,Eva Loth,Tobias Banaschewski,Jan Buitelaar,Declan G. M. Murphy,Emily J. H. Jones,Simon Baron-Cohen,Sarah Durston,Antonio Persico,Sven Bölte,Antonia San Jose Caceres,Hannah Hayward,Daisy Crawley,Jessica Faulkner,Jessica Sabet,Claire Ellis,Bethany Oakley,Rosemary Holt,Sara Ambrosino,Nico Bast,Sarah Baumeister,Annika Rausch,Carsten Bours,Ineke Cornelissen,Daniel von Rhein,Laurence O'Dwyer,Julian Tillmann,Jumana Ahmad,Emily Simonoff,Joerg Hipp,Pilar Garces,Christine Ecker,Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,Heike Tost,Carolin Moessnang,Daniel Brandeis,Christian Beckmann,Flavio Dell' Acqua,Amber Ruigrok,Thomas Bourgeron,The AIMS-2-TRIALS LEAP Team
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64387-9
IF: 4.6
2024-06-20
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Face-processing timing differences may underlie visual social attention differences between autistic and non-autistic people, and males and females. This study investigates the timing of the effects of neurotype and sex on face-processing, and their dependence on age. We analysed EEG data during upright and inverted photographs of faces from 492 participants from the Longitudinal European Autism Project (141 neurotypical males, 76 neurotypical females, 202 autistic males, 73 autistic females; age 6–30 years). We detected timings of sex/diagnosis effects on event-related potential amplitudes at the posterior–temporal channel P8 with Bootstrapped Cluster-based Permutation Analysis and conducted Growth Curve Analysis (GCA) to investigate the timecourse and dependence on age of neural signals. The periods of influence of neurotype and sex overlapped but differed in onset (respectively, 260 and 310 ms post-stimulus), with sex effects lasting longer. GCA revealed a smaller and later amplitude peak in autistic female children compared to non-autistic female children; this difference decreased in adolescence and was not significant in adulthood. No age-dependent neurotype difference was significant in males. These findings indicate that sex and neurotype influence longer latency face processing and implicates cognitive rather than perceptual processing. Sex may have more overarching effects than neurotype on configural face processing.
multidisciplinary sciences