Abstract:AIMS: Exercise intolerance is the leading manifestation of heart failure with preserved or mid-range ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF), and left atrial (LA) function might contribute to modulating left ventricular filling and pulmonary venous pressures. We aim to assess the association between LA function and maximal exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients, prospectively enrolled in the German HFpEF Registry, were analysed. Inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association functional class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%, structural heart disease or diastolic dysfunction, and elevated levels of N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). LA function was evaluated through speckle-tracking echocardiography by central reading in the Charité Academic Echocardiography core lab. All patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and were classified according to a peak VO2 cut-off of prognostic value (14 mL/kg/min). NT-pro-BNP was measured. Twenty-nine patients (45%) reached a peak VO2 < 14 mL/kg/min (mean value 12.4 ± 1.5) and 36 patients (55%) peak VO2 ≥ 14 mL/kg/min (mean value 19.4 ± 3.9). There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (60 ± 9 vs. 59 ± 8%), left ventricular mass (109 ± 23 vs. 112 ± 32 g/m2 ), LA volume index (45 ± 17 vs. 47 ± 22 mL/m2 ), or E/e´ (13.1 ± 4.7 vs. 13.0 ± 6.0) between these groups. In contrast, all LA strain measures were impaired in patients with lower peak VO2 (reservoir strain 14 ± 5 vs. 21 ± 9%, P = 0.002; conduit strain 9 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 4%, P = 0.001; contractile strain 7 ± 4 vs. 11 ± 6%, P = 0.02; reported lower limits of normality for LA reservoir, conduit and contractile strains: 26.1%, 12.0%, and 7.7%). In linear regression analysis, lower values of LA reservoir strain were associated with impaired peak VO2 after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, heart rhythm (sinus/AFib), and log-NTproBNP [β 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.30, P = 0.02], with an odds ratio 1.22 (95% CI 1.05-1.42, P = 0.01) for peak VO2 < 14 mL/kg/min for LA reservoir strain decrease after adjustment for these five covariates. Adding left ventricular ejection fraction, it did not influence the results. On the other hand, the addition of LA strain to the adjustment parameters alone described above provided a significant increase of the predictive value for lower peak VO2 values (R2 0.50 vs. 0.45, P = 0.02). With receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified LA reservoir strain < 22% to have 93% sensitivity and 49% specificity in predicting peak VO2 < 14 mL/kg/min. Using this cut-off, LA reservoir strain < 22% was associated with peak VO2 < 14 mL/kg/min in logistic regression analysis after comprehensive adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, heart rhythm, and log-NTproBNP [odds ratio 95% CI 10.4 (1.4-74), P = 0.02].CONCLUSIONS: In this HFpEF and HFmrEF cohort, a reduction in LA reservoir strain was a sensible marker of decreased peak exercise capacity. Therefore, LA reservoir strain might be of clinical value in predicting exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.

Left atrial function in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction differs from that of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a 2D speckle-tracking echocardiographic study

The assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in patients with different stages of atrial fibrillation

Left atrial structure and function in heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): systematic review and meta-analysis

[Evaluation of Left Atrial Function by Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients].

Left Atrial Function Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Association Between Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impaired Left Atrial Phasic Function in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation by Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking

Left atrial ejection force as a marker for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Progress of echocardiography in the evaluation of left atrial function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a narrative review

Left atrial phasic function remodeling during its enlargement: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study

Association between early changes in left atrial strain and global left ventricular function in patients with heart failure with preserved EF ( HFpEF)

Left atrial mechanics and functional capacity in HFpEF patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Left Atrial Function Assessment in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Valve Diseases

Left atrial strain in acute heart failure: clinical and prognostic insights

Assessment of Left Atrial Function in Essential Hypertension Patients With Normal Left Ventricle Function by Volume-derived Values and Two-dimensional Strain

Clinical Implication of Disturbed Left Atrial Phasic Functions in the Heterogeneous Population Associated with Hypertension or Atrial Fibrillation.

Left atrial function and maximal exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved and mid‐range ejection fraction

Comparison of Left Atrial Function in Healthy Individuals Versus Patients with Non-St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography

Change in left atrial function and volume predicts incident heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Insights on Distinct Left Atrial Remodeling Between Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with dyspnea and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a role of left atrial strain

Impaired Left Atrial Reserve Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction