Abstract:International Journal of Bilingualism, Ahead of Print. Aims:This study aimed to investigate how bilingual advantages in cognitive flexibility were modulated by language-use parameters (e.g., language switching experience) and psychological factors (e.g., acute stress).Design/methodology:Chinese-English unbalanced bilinguals with a high or low amount of language switching experience (HLS or LLS bilinguals) performed a cued color-shape switching task in stress-free condition (Experiment 1) or in acute stress condition induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (Experiment 2). Switching and mixing costs were calculated to denote two aspects of cognitive flexibility: transient and sustained switching abilities, respectively.Data and analysis:Differences in switching and mixing costs between HLS and LLS bilinguals were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The predictive relationship between language switching experience and cognitive flexibility was examined using hierarchical regression models. The role of acute stress in the dynamics was tested by means of independent samples t-tests in a cross-analysis of Experiments 1 and 2.Findings/conclusions:HLS and LLS bilinguals showed similar switching and mixing costs in the stress-free condition, but in the acute stress condition, HLS bilinguals showed lower switching costs than LLS bilinguals. The result of cross-experimental analysis further revealed that higher switching costs were demanded in LLS bilinguals under acute stress. These findings suggest that language switching experience specifically influences transient switching ability under acute stress.Originality:This study was a first attempt to provide evidence that psychological stress may be a crucial determinant in exploring the theoretical implications of cognitive control in bilingualism.Significance:Our findings suggest that bilingual advantages in cognitive flexibility are conditional, shedding light on the ongoing debate about the ambiguous relationship between language experience and cognitive control in bilinguals.

Ecological Validity in Bilingualism Research and the Bilingual Advantage

On the Need for Theoretically Guided Approaches to Possible Bilingual Advantages: An Evaluation of the Potential Loci in the Language and Executive Control Systems

Cognitive Advantage in Bilingualism

A Bilingual Advantage? An Appeal for a Change in Perspective and Recommendations for Future Research

Shifting Gear in the Study of the Bilingual Advantage: Language Switching Examined as a Possible Moderator

Behavioral and oscillatory signatures of switch costs in highly proficient bilinguals

Predictions about the Cognitive Consequences of Language Switching on Executive Functioning Inspired by the Adaptive Control Hypothesis Fail More Often than Not

Does the Bilingual Advantage in Cognitive Control Exist and If So, What Are Its Modulating Factors? A Systematic Review

The Cognitive Science of Bilingualism.

Bilingualism and the executive function trade-off: A latent variable examination of behavioral and event-related brain potentials.

Cognitive and neural mechanisms of voluntary versus forced language switching in Chinese–English bilinguals: an fMRI study

Cultural Effects Rather Than a Bilingual Advantage in Cognition: A Review and an Empirical Study

Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate

The Role of Cognitive Development and Strategic Task Tendencies in the Bilingual Advantage Controversy

How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism

Revisiting the bilingual advantage in attention in low SES Greek-Albanians: does the level of bilingual experience matter?

The effects of language switching experience and acute stress on bilingual advantages in cognitive flexibility

The Interaction between Bilingual Experience and Executive Function

Executive Processes Underpin the Bilingual Advantage on Phonemic Fluency: Evidence From Analyses of Switching and Clustering

Language experiences and cognitive control: A dynamic perspective

Is adaptation involved in bilingual language production? A fresh look at the assumptions motivating potential bilingual-monolingual differences in adaptive control